Synthetic Control and Inference
Open Access
- 28 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Econometrics
- Vol. 5 (4) , 52
Abstract
We examine properties of permutation tests in the context of synthetic control. Permutation tests are frequently used methods of inference for synthetic control when the number of potential control units is small. We analyze the permutation tests from a repeated sampling perspective and show that the size of permutation tests may be distorted. Several alternative methods are discussed.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomization Tests Under an Approximate Symmetry AssumptionEconometrica, 2017
- Regional Policy Evaluation: Interactive Fixed Effects and Synthetic ControlsReview of Economics and Statistics, 2016
- Panel data models with multiple time-varying individual effectsJournal of Econometrics, 2013
- Inference with “Difference in Differences” with a Small Number of Policy ChangesReview of Economics and Statistics, 2011
- Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control ProgramJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2010
- Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed EffectsEconometrica, 2009
- How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- End-of-Sample Instability TestsEconometrica, 2003
- The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque CountryAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- The Large-Sample Power of Tests Based on Permutations of ObservationsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1952