Informed consent for pediatric phase 1 cancer trials: Physicians' perspectives
Open Access
Abstract
BACKGROUND.: This study was conducted to gather pediatric oncologists' opinions about and suggestions for improvement of informed consent (IC) in pediatric phase 1 cancer trials.METHODS.: A questionnaire designed to elicit perspectives was distributed to 146 physicians at 6 participating institutions. A total of 103 completed surveys were returned for a 71% response rate.RESULTS.: Pediatric oncologists believe providing information so families can decide about phase 1 study entry is the most important goal of the IC process (ICP). The majority of physicians (64%) report that they describe the phase 1 study without any attempt to influence parents' decisions. Several answers provided by physicians were associated with their gender and prior IC training. Male physicians were significantly more likely to endorse the no‐attempt‐to‐influence approach, whereas female physicians were more likely to suggest to parents that other children will benefit from what is learned in phase 1 studies. Responses to an open‐ended question provided 63 suggestions for improvement of the ICP, including document and training changes and tools to enhance physician‐family communication.CONCLUSIONS.: Pediatric oncologists tended to present phase 1 trials as an option rather than a strong recommendation and were reluctant to influence decisions of families about these studies. They believe most but not all parents understand key concepts involved in consent to this type of research, and had ample suggestions for how to improve the ICP. Future research and education efforts around this ethically challenging topic were warranted. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Strategy for Hope: A Commentary on Necessary CollusionJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- End-of-Life Research as a Priority for Pediatric OncologyJournal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 2004
- Associations among awareness of prognosis, hopefulness, and coping in patients with advanced cancer participating in phase I clinical trialsSupportive Care in Cancer, 2003
- ‘Hitting you over the head’: Oncologists’ disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patientsBioethics, 2003
- Informed consent for pediatric research: Is it really possible?The Journal of Pediatrics, 2003
- Misunderstanding in Clinical Research: Distinguishing Therapeutic Misconception, Therapeutic Misestimation, & Therapeutic OptimismIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2003
- Dying Children and Medical Research: Access to Clinical Trials as Benefit and BurdenAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 2003
- Pediatric Ethics and Early-Phase Childhood Cancer Research: Conflicted Goals and the Prospect of BenefitAccountability in Research, 2003
- Phase I Cancer Trials: A Collusion of MisunderstandingHastings Center Report, 2000
- Quantitative Analysis of Ethical Issues in Phase I Trials: A Survey Interview Study of 144 Advanced Cancer PatientsIRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2000