The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing
- Vol. 60 (4) , 107-114
Abstract
The authors respond to the thoughtful concerns raised by Dickson (1996) about the issue of path dependencies and the dynamics of resource-advantage (R-A) theory ( Hunt and Morgan 1995 ). Rather than R-A theory and Dickson's work being inconsistent, the authors point out that Hunt and Morgan (1995) cite Dickson's (1992) work on two different occasions as support for the dynamics of R-A theory. Furthermore, because R-A theory proposes that firms seek superior financial performance, when combined with the fact that all firms cannot be superior at the same time, R-A competition necessarily is dynamic. Moreover, though the issue of path-dependencies is more contentious than Dickson suggests, R-A theory fully accommodates path dependencies, because it is an evolutionary, nonconsummatory theory.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Resource-Advantage Theory of CompetitionJournal of Management Inquiry, 1995
- An introduction to evolutionary theories in economicsJournal of Evolutionary Economics, 1994
- Network Externality: An Uncommon TragedyJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of GrowthJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Perspectives on Growth TheoryJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- The Origins of Endogenous GrowthJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based viewStrategic Management Journal, 1993
- Human Capital, Product Quality, and GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive AdvantageAcademy of Management Review, 1990
- A Contribution to the Theory of Economic GrowthThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956