Audio-Based Care for Managing Diabetes in Adults
Authors:
- Shivani ReddySRShivani Reddy
- Graham Bsph BoothGBGraham Bsph Booth
- Manny Coker-SchwimmerMCManny Coker-Schwimmer
- Shannon Mlis KugleySKShannon Mlis Kugley
- Ivette Ba Rodriguez-BorjaIRIvette Ba Rodriguez-Borja
- Sheila V. PatelSPSheila V. Patel
- Miku Bs FujitaMFMiku Bs Fujita
- Sarah PhilbrickSPSarah Philbrick
- Richa Bs RuwalaRRRicha Bs Ruwala
- Jordan A. AlbrittonJAJordan A. Albritton
- Karen CrottyKCKaren Crotty
Open Access
- 9 January 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 63 (2) , 152-163
Abstract
Objectives: We compared the effectiveness of audio-based care, as a replacement or a supplement to usual care, for managing diabetes. Background: Diabetes is a chronic condition afflicting many in the United States. The impact of audio-based care on the health of individuals with diabetes is unclear, particularly for those at risk for disparities—many of whom may only be able to access telehealth services through telephone. Methods: We used systematic review methods to synthesize available evidence. We systematically searched for English-language articles from 2012 reporting randomized controlled trials of adults diagnosed with diabetes. We abstracted data on clinical outcomes (including A1c), patient-reported health and quality-of-life, health care access and utilization, care quality and experience, and patient safety. Results: Evidence for replacing in-person care with audio care was limited (n = 2), with low certainty of evidence for greater and comparable effectiveness for A1c and harms, respectively. Supplemental audio care (n = 23) had a positive effect on A1c (pooled mean difference A1c −0.20%; n = 8763; 95% CI: −0.36% to −0.04%), with moderate certainty of evidence. Stratified results indicated that audio interventions supplementing usual care performed more favorably in individuals with A1c ≤ 9%; populations not at risk of disparities; interventions with at least monthly contact; and interventions using remote monitoring tools. Conclusions: This evidence base reveals some promise for managing diabetes with audio-based care as a supplement to in-person care. Future studies could further investigate the effectiveness of audio-based care as a replacement and modify interventions to better serve individuals with poor glucose control and those at risk for disparities.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Living Well With Diabetes: 24-Month Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Telephone-Delivered Weight Loss and Physical Activity Intervention to Improve Glycemic ControlDiabetes Care, 2014
- Effectiveness of a Supportive Telephone Counseling Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Randomized Controlled StudyPLOS ONE, 2013
- The Cholesterol, Hypertension, And Glucose Education (CHANGE) study: Results from a randomized controlled trial in African Americans with diabetesAmerican Heart Journal, 2013
- Impact of Remote Management of Diabetes via Computer: The 360 Study—A Proof-of-Concept Randomized TrialDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2013
- The relationship between changes in steps/day and health outcomes after a pedometer-based physical activity intervention with telephone support in type 2 diabetes patientsHealth Education Research, 2013
- A Randomized Comparison of Online- and Telephone-Based Care Management with Internet Training Alone in Adult Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2012
- Health coaching by telephony to support self-care in chronic diseases: clinical outcomes from The TERVA randomized controlled trialBMC Health Services Research, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Criteria for previously undiagnosed diabetes and risk of mortality: 15‐year follow‐up of the Edinburgh Artery Study cohortDiabetic Medicine, 2005
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986