The Ends of Deliberation: Meta‐consensus and Inter‐subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes
Open Access
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Swiss Political Science Review
- Vol. 13 (4) , 497-526
Abstract
Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter‐related concepts of meta‐consensus and inter‐subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concept Stretching: The Case of DeliberationEuropean Political Science, 2008
- The Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy: Setting a Research AgendaActa Politica, 2005
- Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A ReconciliationBritish Journal of Political Science, 2002
- A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face?to?Face GroupsCommunication Theory, 2002
- Between Fear and Disappointment: Critical, Empirical and Political Uses of HabermasPolitical Studies, 1997
- Complexity and deliberative democracyInquiry, 1996
- The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and ProceduresThe Journal of Politics, 1996
- Incompletely Theorized AgreementsHarvard Law Review, 1995
- The Relationship between Information, Ideology, and Voting BehaviorAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1987
- An Epistemic Conception of DemocracyEthics, 1986