A Global and Some National Perspectives on the Current Evidence of Interventions on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries
Authors:
- Sonja Y. HessSHSonja Y. Hess
- Imelda Angeles-AgdeppaIAImelda Angeles-Agdeppa
- Joyce KinaboJKJoyce Kinabo
- Manisha TharaneyMTManisha Tharaney
- Fusta AzupogoFAFusta Azupogo
- Lilia BliznashkaLBLilia Bliznashka
- Guy-Marino HinnouhoGHGuy-Marino Hinnouho
- Nadia KoyrattyNKNadia Koyratty
- Taryn J. SmithTSTaryn J. Smith
- Deanna K. OlneyDODeanna K. Olney
Open Access
- 28 August 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Food and Nutrition Bulletin
- Vol. 46 (1_suppl) , S35-S44
Abstract
Adequate amounts of fruit and vegetables (F&V) are an important part of a healthy diet, yet intake is suboptimal in most population groups worldwide. To better understand the evidence of strategies aiming to improve F&V intake, we conducted a scoping review of interventions assessing the impact on F&V intake, including those aiming to improve F&V intake explicitly and those targeting diet, health, lifestyle, or food environment generally. Among all eligible interventions reviewed, most of which were implemented in high-income countries, about half reported a significant positive impact on fruit and/or vegetable intake. Interventions that used a multicomponent strategy (61%) and those that focused on F&V specifically (72%) were most likely to find a significant increase in fruit and/or vegetable intake. Detailed summaries are provided in 2 accompanying articles. In the present article, we put these findings into perspective. Specifically, we considered the evidence for 4 target countries of the Fruit and Vegetables for Sustainable Healthy Diets Initiative: Benin, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania. When considering available evidence at the national level, there is a paucity of information from intervention trials despite evidence of inadequate F&V intakes in each of these countries. When considering available evidence at the global level, and especially for low-and-middle income countries, there is a critical need to strengthen the evidence across various intervention strategies, particularly related to targeting, timing, intensity, duration, frequency, and other key characteristics, to better understand how to enhance their impact on F&V intake in various population groups and contexts.Keywords
Funding Information
- CGIAR Trust Fund
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Impact Pathways to Nutrition OutcomesAdvances in Nutrition, 2020
- Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysisThe Lancet Global Health, 2020
- Global Patterns of Adolescent Fruit, Vegetable, Carbonated Soft Drink, and Fast-Food Consumption: A Meta-Analysis of Global School-Based Student Health SurveysFood and Nutrition Bulletin, 2019
- The impact of a Solar Market Garden programme on dietary diversity, women’s nutritional status and micronutrient levels in Kalalé district of northern BeninPublic Health Nutrition, 2019
- Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables Among Individuals 15 Years and Older in 28 Low- and Middle-Income CountriesThe Journal of Nutrition, 2019
- Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systemsThe Lancet, 2019
- Insufficient Fruit and Vegetable Intake in a Low- and Middle-Income Setting: A Population-Based Survey in Semi-Urban TanzaniaNutrients, 2018
- Availability, affordability, and consumption of fruits and vegetables in 18 countries across income levels: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) studyThe Lancet Global Health, 2016
- School-based intervention to enable school children to act as change agents on weight, physical activity and diet of their mothers: a cluster randomized controlled trialInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2016
- An analysis of consumer demand for fruits in Sri Lanka. 1981–2010Appetite, 2013