Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison
Authors:
- Majid MoshirfarMajid Moshirfar
- Joshua A. SchliesserJSJoshua A. Schliesser
- Joann C. ChangJCJoann C. Chang
- Thomas J. ObergTOThomas J. Oberg
- Mark D. MifflinMMMark D. Mifflin
- Richard TownleyRTRichard Townley
- Myrna K. LivingstonMLMyrna K. Livingston
- Christopher J. KurzCKChristopher J. Kurz
- 1 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 36 (8) , 1336-1343
Abstract
To compare visual outcomes between wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Academic center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. In this randomized prospective study, myopic eyes were treated with wavefront-guided PRK and or wavefront-guided LASIK using a Visx Star S4 CustomVue platform with iris registration. Primary outcome measures were uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities and manifest refraction. Secondary outcome measures were higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity. The PRK group comprised 101 eyes and the LASIK group, 102 eyes. At 6 months, the mean UDVA was -0.03 logMAR +/- 0.10 [SD] (20/19) and 0.07 +/- 0.09 logMAR (20/24), respectively (P = .544). In both groups, 75% eyes achieved a UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = .923); 77% of eyes in the PRK group and 88% in the LASIK group were within +/-0.50 diopter of emmetropia (P = .760). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, or 18 cycles per degree. The mean postoperative HOA root mean square was 0.45 +/- 0.13 mum in the PRK group and 0.59 +/- 0.22 mum in the LASIK group (P = .012), representing an increase factor of 1.22 and 1.74, respectively. Wavefront-guided PRK and wavefront-guided LASIK had similar efficacy, predictability, safety, and contrast sensitivity; however, wavefront-guided PRK induced statistically fewer HOAs than wavefront-guided LASIK at 6 months. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Study of Higher-Order Aberrations After Conventional Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis for Myopia Using the Technolas 217z Laser PlatformAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009
- Wavefront-Guided LASIK for the Correction of Primary Myopia and AstigmatismOphthalmology, 2008
- Photorefractive Keratectomy With Mitomycin C Versus LASIK in Custom Surgeries for Myopia: A Bilateral Prospective Randomized Clinical TrialJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2008
- Photorefractive Keratectomy With 0.02% Mitomycin C for Treatment of Residual Refractive Errors After LASIKJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2008
- Higher Order Aberrations and Relative Risk of Symptoms After LASIKJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2007
- Refractive Surgery Survey 2004Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topographyOphthalmology, 2004
- Comparison of higher-order aberrations after LASEK with a 6.0 mm ablation zone and a 6.5 mm ablation zone with blend zoneJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2004
- A Novel Grading Method for Superficial Punctate Keratopathy Magnitude and Its Correlation With Corneal Epithelial PermeabilityArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 2003
- Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Excimer LaserOphthalmology, 1991