Research priorities in children and adults with congenital heart disease: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
Open Access
- 1 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Open Heart
- Vol. 9 (2) , e002147
Abstract
Objective To bring together patients, parents, charities and clinicians in a Priority Setting Partnership to establish national clinical priorities for research in children and adults with congenital heart disease. Methods The established James Lind Alliance methodology was used to identify and prioritise research on the management of congenital heart disease, focusing on diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. An initial open survey was used to gather potential uncertainties which were filtered, categorised, converted into summary questions and checked against current evidence. In a second survey, respondents identified the unanswered questions most important to them. At two final workshops, patients, parents, charities and healthcare professionals agreed the top 10 lists of priorities for child/antenatal and adult congenital heart disease research. Results 524 respondents submitted 1373 individual questions, from which 313 out of scope or duplicate questions were removed. The remaining 1060 questions were distilled into summary questions and checked against existing literature, with only three questions deemed entirely answered and removed. 250 respondents completed the child/antenatal survey (56 uncertainties) and 252 completed the adult survey (47 uncertainties). The questions ranked the highest by clinicians and non-clinicians were taken forward to consensus workshops, where two sets of top 10 research priorities were agreed. Conclusions Through an established and equitable process, we determined national clinical priorities for congenital heart disease research. These will be taken forward by specific working groups, a national patient and public involvement group, and through the establishment of a UK and Ireland network for collaborative, multicentre clinical trials in congenital heart disease.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethnic and socioeconomic variation in incidence of congenital heart defectsArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2016
- Death and Emergency Readmission of Infants Discharged After Interventions for Congenital Heart Disease: A National Study of 7643 Infants to Inform Service ImprovementJournal of the American Heart Association, 2016
- Emerging Research Directions in Adult Congenital Heart DiseaseJACC, 2016
- Three parties, one direction: Research priorities in adults with congenital heart disease. What do professionals, patients and relatives want to know?International Journal of Cardiology, 2016
- Survival Prospects and Circumstances of Death in Contemporary Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients Under Follow-Up at a Large Tertiary CentreCirculation, 2015
- Trends in 30-day mortality rate and case mix for paediatric cardiac surgery in the UK between 2000 and 2010Open Heart, 2015
- Clinical research priorities in adult congenital heart diseaseInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2014
- Congenital heart disease beyond the age of 60: emergence of a new population with high resource utilization, high morbidity, and high mortalityEuropean Heart Journal, 2013
- The Pediatric Heart Network: A Primer for the Conduct of Multicenter Studies in Children with Congenital and Acquired Heart DiseasePediatric Cardiology, 2005
- The James Lind Alliance: patients and clinicians should jointly identify their priorities for clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2004