A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
Authors:
- Rakesh AggarwalRARakesh Aggarwal
- Nikhil GupteNGNikhil Gupte
- Nancy KassNKNancy Kass
- Holly TaylorHTHolly Taylor
- Joseph AliJAJoseph Ali
- Anant BhanABAnant Bhan
- Amita AggarwalAAAmita Aggarwal
- Stephen D SissonSSStephen D Sisson
- Sukon KanchanaraksaSKSukon Kanchanaraksa
- Jane McKenzie-WhiteJMJane McKenzie-White
- John McGreadyJMJohn McGready
- Paolo MiottiPMPaolo Miotti
Open Access
- 17 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Education
- Vol. 11 (1) , 37
Abstract
Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biostatistics and Research Ethics, through either on-line distance learning format or traditional on-site training, in a randomized study in India. Our objective was to determine whether on-line courses in Biostatistics and Research Ethics could achieve similar improvements in knowledge, as traditional on-site, classroom-based courses. Subjects: Volunteer Indian scientists were randomly assigned to one of two arms. Intervention: Students in Arm 1 attended a 3.5-day on-site course in Biostatistics and completed a 3.5-week on-line course in Research Ethics. Students in Arm 2 attended a 3.5-week on-line course in Biostatistics and 3.5-day on-site course in Research Ethics. For the two course formats, learning objectives, course contents and knowledge tests were identical. Main Outcome Measures: Improvement in knowledge immediately and 3-months after course completion, compared to baseline. Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms (n = 29 each). Median knowledge score for Biostatistics increased from a baseline of 49% to 64% (p < 0.001) 3 months after the on-site course, and from 48% to 63% (p = 0.009) after the on-line course. For the on-site Research Ethics course, median score increased from 69% to 83% (p = 0.005), and for the on-line Research Ethics course from 62% to 80% (p < 0.001). Three months after the course, median gains in knowledge scores remained similar for the on-site and on-line platforms for both Biostatistics (16% vs. 12%; p = 0.59) and Research Ethics (17% vs. 13%; p = 0.14). On-line and on-site training formats led to marked and similar improvements of knowledge in Biostatistics and Research Ethics. This, combined with logistical and cost advantages of on-line training, may make on-line courses particularly useful for expanding health research capacity in resource-limited settings.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to improve medical education website designBMC Medical Education, 2010
- A comparative evaluation of the effect of internet-based CME delivery format on satisfaction, knowledge and confidenceBMC Medical Education, 2010
- Online Education TodayScience, 2009
- Internet-Based Learning in the Health ProfessionsJAMA, 2008
- Evaluation of Learning Outcomes in Web-Based Continuing Medical EducationAcademic Medicine, 2006
- Comparison of the Instructional Efficacy of Internet-Based CME With Live Interactive CME WorkshopsJAMA, 2005
- Building capacity in health research in the developing world.2004
- A practical guide to developing effective web-based learningJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- Web-based LearningAcademic Medicine, 2002
- Strengthening health research capacity in developing countries: a critical element for achieving health equity Commentary: Health research and human development in Papua New Guinea Commentary: Does strengthening research capacity improve health equity?BMJ, 2000