Individual differences impacting skin deformation and tactile discrimination with compliant elastic surfaces
- 23 August 2021
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Vol. 2021, 721-726
Abstract
Individual differences in tactile acuity are observed within and between age cohorts. Such differences in acuity may be attributed to various sources, including aspects of nervous system, skin mechanics, finger size, cognitive and behavioral factors, etc. This work considers individual differences, within a younger cohort of participants, in discriminating compliant surfaces. These participants exhibit a range of finger size and stiffness. Interestingly, both their finger size and stiffness well predict their discriminative performance, where softer/smaller fingers outperform stiffer/larger fingers. Stereo imaging captured biomechanical cues in the skin’s deformation, including contact area and penetration depth, and their change rates. In those individuals with stiffer/larger fingers, who perceptually performed worse, we observed less distinguishable contact areas and eccentricities, compared to softer/smaller fingers. These particular cues well predicted individual differences observed in perceptual discrimination. In comparison, with two other cues, curvature and penetration depth, the imaging readily distinguished the compliant surfaces irrespective of finger stiffness/size, not aligned with discrimination. In conclusion, in passive touch, we find that individuals with softer/smaller fingers were better at discriminating compliances, and that certain skin deformation cues predict individual differences in perception.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental determination of the Young's modulus for the fingers with application in prehension systems for small cylindrical objectsIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016
- Computational modeling indicates that surface pressure can be reliably conveyed to tactile receptors even amidst changes in skin mechanicsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2016
- A complementary role of intracortical inhibition in age-related tactile degradation and its remodelling in humansScientific Reports, 2016
- Characterization of nonlinear finger pad mechanics for tactile rendering2015
- A personal touch2012
- Diminutive Digits Discern Delicate Details: Fingertip Size and the Sex Difference in Tactile Spatial AcuityThe Journal of Neuroscience, 2009
- A Continuum Mechanical Model of Mechanoreceptive Afferent Responses to Indented Spatial PatternsJournal of Neurophysiology, 2006
- Fingertip skin conformance accounts, in part, for differences in tactile spatial acuity in young subjects, but not for the decline in spatial acuity with agingPerception & Psychophysics, 2004
- Thickness of the stratum corneum of the volar fingertipsClinical Anatomy, 2000
- The Relationship between Skin Compliance, Age, Gender, and Tactile Discriminative Thresholds in HumansSomatosensory & Motor Research, 1993