Assessment of Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography System with Different Anode-Filter Combinations Using MCNP Code
Open Access
- 1 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Brieflands in Iranian Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 13 (4) , e36484
Abstract
Background: X-ray mammography is one of the general methods for early detection of breast cancer. Since glandular tissue in the breast is sensitive to radiation and it increases the risk of cancer, the given dose to the patient is very important in mammography. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the average absorbed dose of X-ray radiation in the glandular tissue of the breast during mammography examinations as well as investigating factors that influence the mean glandular dose (MGD). One of the precise methods for determination of MGD absorbed by the breast is Monte Carlo simulation method which is widely used to assess the dose. Materials and Methods: We studied some different X-ray sources and exposure factors that affect the MGD. “Midi-future” digital mammography system with amorphous-selenium detector was simulated using the Monte Carlo N-particle extended (MCNPX) code. Different anode/filter combinations such as tungsten/silver (W/Ag), tungsten/rhodium (W/Rh), and rhodium/aluminium (Rh/Al) were simulated in this study. The voltage of X-ray tube ranged from 24 kV to 32 kV with 2 kV intervals and the breast phantom thickness ranged from 3 to 8 cm, and glandular fraction g varied from 10% to 100%. Results: MGD was measured for different anode/filter combinations and the effects of changing tube voltage, phantom thickness, combination and glandular breast tissue on MGD were studied. As glandular g and X-ray tube voltage increased, the breast dose increased too, and the increase of breast phantom thickness led to the decrease of MGD. The obtained results for MGD were consistent with the result of Boone et al. that was previously reported. Conclusion: By comparing the results, we saw that W/Rh anode/filter combination is the best choice in breast mammography imaging because of the lowest delivered dose in comparison with W/Ag and Rh/Al. Moreover, breast thickness and g value have significant effects on MGD. Keywords: Breast phantom; Digital Mammography System; Mean Glandular Dose; MCNP CodeKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Image quality and dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: A Monte Carlo studyRadiation Physics and Chemistry, 2014
- ?The effect of magnification on image quality and radiation dose in X-ray digital mammography: a Monte Carlo simulation studyJournal of the Korean Physical Society, 2010
- Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detectorBritish Journal of Radiology, 2010
- Monte Carlo Simulation of Average Glandular Dose and an Investigation of Influencing FactorsJournal of Radiation Research, 2010
- Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/ x‐ray anode‐filter combinationsMedical Physics, 2008
- X‐ray spectrum optimization of full‐field digital mammography: Simulation and phantom studyMedical Physics, 2006
- Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.British Journal of Radiology, 2000
- Glandular Breast Dose for Monoenergetic and High-Energy X-ray Beams: Monte Carlo AssessmentRadiology, 1999
- Breast dosimetryApplied Radiation and Isotopes, 1998
- Absorbed Radiation Dose in MammographyRadiology, 1979