Change in Hemoglobin A1c and Quality of Life with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use by People with Insulin-Treated Diabetes in the Landmark Study
Authors:
Open Access
- 2 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 23 (1_suppl) , S35-S39
Abstract
Background: Initiating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can affect hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and patients' relationship with their diabetes. We used real-world HbA1c data to quantify short-term changes in glycemia and validated psychosocial questionnaires to assess changes in quality-of-life indicators in people during their first few months of CGM use. Methods: Eligibility was assessed during calls to Dexcom sales regarding its G6 CGM System. Eligibility criteria included ages 25–65 years, type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) on intensive insulin therapy (IIT), and no prior CGM use. Participants used a web-based portal to complete the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) and the 14-item Hypoglycemia Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS); provided validated HbA1c measurements; and shared their CGM data pre- and 3–5 months post-CGM initiation. Satisfaction and ease of use with the G6 System were also assessed. Results: Data were available from 248 patients (182 with T1D, 66 with T2D; 57% male, 88% non-Hispanic white). Mean (standard deviation) HbA1c fell significantly from 8.2% (1.9%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.1%) at the end of the study ( P < 0.001); more than half (54.4%) of those with initial HbA1c values >7% experienced absolute HbA1c reductions of >1%. Significant reductions in diabetes distress (DDS) and hypoglycemic concerns (HABS) were observed ( P < 0.001). Most (93%) participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the G6 System and 73% found it very easy to use. Conclusions: The first 3 months of CGM use was correlated with improvements in psychosocial outcomes and improved HbA1c levels for people with T1D or T2D who use IIT.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin InjectionsJAMA, 2017
- The Rationale for Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Diabetes Treatment Decisions and Non-adjunctive Continuous Glucose Monitoring UsetouchREVIEWS in Endocrinology, 2016
- Identifying the worries and concerns about hypoglycemia in adults with type 2 diabetesJournal of Diabetes and its Complications, 2015
- Current State of Type 1 Diabetes Treatment in the U.S.: Updated Data From the T1D Exchange Clinic RegistryDiabetes Care, 2015
- Reductions in Regimen Distress Are Associated With Improved Management and Glycemic Control Over TimeDiabetes Care, 2014
- Achievement of Goals in U.S. Diabetes Care, 1999–2010New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- When Is Diabetes Distress Clinically Meaningful?Diabetes Care, 2012
- Short- and Long-Term Effects of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2011
- Assessing Psychosocial Distress in DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2005
- A Systematic Review of Adherence With Medications for DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2004