Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
- 1 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
- Vol. 24 (2) , 179-185
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications rates, reoperation rates, and the learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplastyJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2014
- A Complication-based Learning Curve From 200 Reverse Shoulder ArthroplastiesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic reviewJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2011
- Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement: Intraoperative and Early Postoperative ComplicationsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- The results of arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the shoulderThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- Total shoulder arthroplasty: Long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of lifeJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2005
- Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanicsJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2005
- Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuffThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2004
- A prospective functional outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuffJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2003
- A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder functionJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 1994