Gender Capital and Male Bodybuilders
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Body & Society
- Vol. 15 (1) , 83-107
Abstract
Cultural capital and hegemonic masculinity are two concepts that have received intense attention. While both have received serious consideration, critique and analysis, the context or field-specificity of each is sometimes ignored. They have been used in a diversity of ways. Using ethnographic and interview data from a US male bodybuilding community, this study highlights one useful employment. Hegemonic masculinity takes different shapes in different fields of interaction, acting as a form of cultural capital: gender capital. Inherent in this discussion are the cultural contradictions apparent among individuals striving for either physical or ideological embodiments of gender capital. Individuals can attempt to embody hegemonic idealizations, but bodies are not only inscribed with gender, inscriptions are read, and read differently by different social actors and in different settings. The capacity of gender capital to remain elusive is precisely what enables gender practices and projects like bodybuilding to retain passionate participation.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender, Sociological Theory and Bourdieu’s Sociology of PracticeTheory, Culture & Society, 2006
- Hegemonic MasculinityGender & Society, 2005
- Globalization and Business MasculinitiesMen and Masculinities, 2005
- Creating `The Perfect Body': A Variable ProjectBody & Society, 1999
- Interaction Order and Beyond: A Field Analysis of Body Culture Within Fitness GymsBody & Society, 1999
- Gender, Habitus and the FieldTheory, Culture & Society, 1999
- ReplyGender & Society, 1998
- Pugs at Work: Bodily Capital and Bodily Labour among Professional BoxersBody & Society, 1995
- Review Article: Why Men Desire MusclesBody & Society, 1995
- THE PROBLEM OF THE CONCEPT:Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1989