Electronic House Arrest and Boot Camp in North Carolina: Comparing Recidivism
Authors:
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice Policy Review
- Vol. 8 (4) , 383-403
Abstract
Using official data records, this study examined differences in recidi vism - defined as fingerprinted rearrest - among participants in two wide ly used intermediate sanctions, electronic house arrest (N=331) and boot camp prison (N=309). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of recidivism. Participation in the boot camp program, as opposed to electronic house arrest was consistently associated with avoiding rearrest, and race (African-American) was associated with being rearrested for several categories of offense. The conclusion was that although techno logical advances may be of significant assistance to correctional practi tioners, such advances alone are not the magic bullet that will insure future compliance with the law.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is less better?: Boot camp, regular probation and rearrest in North CarolinaAmerican Journal of Criminal Justice, 1997
- Recidivism among boot camp graduates: A comparison of drug offenders to other offendersJournal of Criminal Justice, 1996
- DO BOOT CAMP GRADUATES MAKE BETTER PROBATIONERS?Journal of Crime and Justice, 1996
- The impact of shock incarceration on technical violations and new criminal activitiesJustice Quarterly, 1993
- The parole performance of offenders released from shock incarceration (boot camp prisons): A survival time analysisJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 1991
- Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring: Comparing Pretrial and Postconviction ProgramsCrime & Delinquency, 1990
- A General Theory of Crime1990
- The Ethics of Community-Based SanctionsCrime & Delinquency, 1990
- A Survey of Juvenile Electronic Monitoring and Home Confinement ProgramsJuvenile & Family Court Journal, 1989