Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009
Authors:
- Lawrence B. FinerLFLawrence B. Finer
- Jenna JermanJJJenna Jerman
- Megan L. KavanaughMKMegan L. Kavanaugh
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 98 (4) , 893-897
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 R01 HD059896)
- National Institutes of Health (1 R01 HD059896)
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determinants of and Disparities in Reproductive Health Service Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Women in the United States, 2002–2008American Journal of Public Health, 2012
- Prepregnancy contraceptive use among teens with unintended pregnancies resulting in live births - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2008.2012
- Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006Contraception, 2011
- Characteristics of Women in the United States Who Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive MethodsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Unintended Pregnancy Among U.S. Adolescents: Accounting for Sexual ActivityJournal of Adolescent Health, 2010
- The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraceptionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 109: Cervical Cytology ScreeningObstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United StatesContraception, 2009
- ACOG Practice Bulletin #59: Intrauterine DeviceObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States collaborative review of sterilizationObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999