From human rights to sentient rights
- 1 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
- Vol. 16 (5) , 655-675
Abstract
This article calls for a paradigm shift in the language, theory and practice of human rights: it calls for human rights to be reconceptualized as sentient rights. It argues that human rights are not qualitatively distinct from the basic entitlements of other sentient creatures, and that attempts to differentiate human rights by appealing to something distinctive about humanity, their unique political function or their universality ultimately fail. Finally, the article claims that moving to sentient rights will not lead to intractable conflicts between rights, but to a more inclusive, fair and rationally defensible normative enterprise.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention?Philosophy Compass, 2009
- Do Animals Have an Interest in Liberty?Political Studies, 2009
- Rethinking Human Rights, Democracy, and Sovereignty in the Age of GlobalizationPolitical Theory, 2008
- Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality*Journal of Political Philosophy, 2007
- Human RightsSocial Theory and Practice, 2005
- Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?Journal of Political Philosophy, 2004
- Human Rights, Universality and the Values of Personhood: Retracing Griffin's StepsEuropean Journal of Philosophy, 2002
- Liberating dutiesLaw and Philosophy, 1989
- The good of treesThe Journal of Value Inquiry, 1981
- FEINBERG ON WHAT SORTS OF BEINGS CAN HAVE RIGHTS1The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 1976