Clinicopathological factors associated with tumour‐specific mutation detection in plasma of patients with RAS‐mutated or BRAF‐mutated metastatic colorectal cancer
Open Access
- 7 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 149 (6) , 1385-1397
Abstract
Detection of tumour‐specific circulating cell‐free DNA in plasma (ctDNA) fails in a significant number of cases depending on the clinical context. The primary aim was to investigate clinicopathological factors associated with detection of ctDNA in patients with RAS‐/BRAF‐mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) prior to first‐line therapy. A secondary aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of ctDNA compared to other biomarkers. Patients were included from the NORDIC‐VII study (N = 253). ctDNA was sampled prior to treatment and analysed for hotspot tissue mutations (KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF) using droplet digital PCR. Multivariable regression models were constructed to predict the probability of mutation detection and survival. Increasing radiological size of target lesions by increments of 1 cm (odds ratio [OR] = 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09‐1.27; P < .001), intact primary tumour (OR = 3.17; 95% CI 1.22‐8.22; P = .018) and more than one metastatic site (OR = 3.08; 95% CI 1.32‐7.19; P = .009) were associated with mutation detection in plasma. Metastatic involvement of the lung was associated with non‐detection (OR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.12‐0.58; P = .001). Preanalytical and analytical factors modulated detection. High allele frequencies of ctDNA indicated poor prognosis independently of CEA and CA19‐9 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38; 95% CI 1.74‐3.26; P < .001; N = 206). Clinicopathological characteristics should be carefully considered when evaluating ctDNA results from mCRC patients, especially when confronted with a plasma negative result. ctDNA may prove to be a clinically useful marker in the evaluation of mCRC treatment.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cancerfonden
- Kreftforeningen
- Merck KGaA
- Novo Nordisk Fonden
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNANature Medicine, 2014
- Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human MalignanciesScience Translational Medicine, 2014
- Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and ElaborationPLOS Medicine, 2012
- Phase III Trial of Cetuximab With Continuous or Intermittent Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (Nordic FLOX) Versus FLOX Alone in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NORDIC-VII StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancerCancer, 2011
- Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS studyAnnals of Oncology, 2011
- Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- K-rasMutations and Benefit from Cetuximab in Advanced Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Correlation of plasma CEA and CEA tissue staining in poorly differentiated colorectal cancerThe American Journal of Medicine, 1981