Reproducible and reliable microarray results through quality control: good laboratory proficiency and appropriate data analysis practices are essential
Authors:
- Leming ShiLSLeming Shi
- Roger G PerkinsRPRoger G Perkins
- Hong FangHFHong Fang
- Weida TongWTWeida Tong
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Current Opinion in Biotechnology
- Vol. 19 (1) , 10-18
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- An integrated bioinformatics infrastructure essential for advancing pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine in the context of the FDA's Critical Path InitiativeDrug Discovery Today: Technologies, 2007
- Impact of microarray data quality on genomic data submissions to the FDANature Biotechnology, 2006
- Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancerProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensusNature Reviews Genetics, 2006
- FDA pharmacogenomics guidance sends clear message to industryNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2005
- An array of problemsNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2005
- Microarrays and molecular research: noise discovery?The Lancet, 2005
- Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategyThe Lancet, 2005
- Getting the Noise Out of Gene Arrays2004
- Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platformsNucleic Acids Research, 2003