Formulas, Algorithms and Examples for Binomial Distributed Data Confidence Interval Calculation: Excess Risk, Relative Risk and Odds Ratio
Open Access
- 7 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 9 (19) , 2506
Abstract
Medical studies often involve a comparison between two outcomes, each collected from a sample. The probability associated with, and confidence in the result of the study is of most importance, since one may argue that having been wrong with a percent could be what killed a patient. Sampling is usually done from a finite and discrete population and it follows a Bernoulli trial, leading to a contingency of two binomially distributed samples (better known as contingency table). Current guidelines recommend reporting relative measures of association (such as the relative risk and odds ratio) in conjunction with absolute measures of association (which include risk difference or excess risk). Because the distribution is discrete, the evaluation of the exact confidence interval for either of those measures of association is a mathematical challenge. Some alternate scenarios were analyzed (continuous vs. discrete; hypergeometric vs. binomial), and in the main case—bivariate binomial experiment—a strategy for providing exact p-values and confidence intervals is proposed. Algorithms implementing the strategy are given.
Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in an Outpatient Rheumatology ClinicArthritis Care & Research, 2013
- Evaluation of Serum Adipokines in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseMediators of Inflammation, 2012
- Predictivity Approach for Quantitative Structure-Property Models. Application for Blood-Brain Barrier Permeation of Diverse Drug-Like CompoundsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2011
- Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial ProportionsThe American Statistician, 1998
- Binomial Confidence IntervalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983
- Development and Testing of a Formant-Coding Speech Compression SystemThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1956
- Plancks Gesetz und LichtquantenhypotheseThe European Physical Journal A, 1924
- On the Interpretation of χ 2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of PJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1922
- ON THE GENERAL THEORY OF MULTIPLE CONTINGENCY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PARTIAL CONTINGENCYBiometrika, 1916
- THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEANBiometrika, 1908