Talking About SOME and ALL: What Determines the Usage of Quantity-Denoting Expressions?
Authors:
- 25 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Discourse Processes
- Vol. 55 (8) , 686-703
Abstract
Reference production is often studied through single dimensions of contrast (e.g., “tall glass” when there are one or two glasses of varying height). Yet real-world communication is rarely so simple, raising questions about the factors guiding more complex referents. The current study examines decisions to mention set relations (e.g., using quantity-denoting expressions like “some of the houses” to refer to two of five houses) versus object categories only (e.g., using bare plurals like “houses”). Two experiments used vignettes to vary discourse focus on objects (prominent vs. nonprominent) and scenes to vary the set type described (subset vs. total set). Speakers were more likely to communicate set relations of prominent objects, particularly when they elicit high name agreement in the case of total sets. Speakers’ use of quantity-denoting expressions also increased listeners’ sensitivity to set relations in an object-matching task. This suggests that unlike simpler forms of modification that often decrease with greater focus, quantity-denoting expressions provide additional information about the set relations of prominent referents.Keywords
Funding Information
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD061173)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
- How language production shapes language form and comprehensionFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
- The use of visual context during the production of referring expressionsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2010
- “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichmentCognition, 2010
- How Speakers Refer: The Role of AccessibilityLanguage and Linguistics Compass, 2010
- Real‐Time Investigation of Referential Domains in Unscripted Conversation: A Targeted Language Game ApproachCognitive Science, 2008
- The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts☆Journal of Memory and Language, 2007
- Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning☆Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
- How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?Cognition, 2005