Feasibility of a Comprehensive Targeted Cholera Intervention in The Kathmandu Valley, Nepal
Authors:
- Mellisa RoskoskyMellisa Roskosky
- Bhim AcharyaBhim Acharya
- Geeta ShakyaGeeta Shakya
- Kshitij KarkiKshitij Karki
- Kazutaka SekineKazutaka Sekine
- Deepak BajracharyaDeepak Bajracharya
- Lorenz von SeidleinLorenz von Seidlein
- Isabelle DevauxIsabelle Devaux
- Anna Lena LopezAnna Lena Lopez
- Jacqueline DeenJacqueline Deen
- David A. SackDavid A. Sack
Open Access
- 1 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Vol. 100 (5) , 1088-1097
Abstract
A comprehensive targeted intervention (CTI) was designed and deployed in the neighborhoods of cholera cases in the Kathmandu Valley with the intent of reducing rates among the neighbors of the case. This was a feasibility study to determine whether clinical centers, laboratories, and field teams were able to mount a rapid, community-based response to a case within 2 days of hospital admission. Daily line listings were requested from 15 participating hospitals during the monsoon season, and a single case initiated the CTI. A standard case definition was used: acute watery diarrhea, with or without vomiting, in a patient aged 1 year or older. Rapid diagnostic tests and bacterial culture were used for confirmation. The strategy included household investigation of cases; water testing; water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention; and health education. A CTI coverage survey was conducted 8 months postintervention. From June to December of 2016, 169 cases of Vibrio cholerae O1 were confirmed by bacterial culture. Average time to culture result was 3 days. On average, the CTI Rapid Response Team (RRT) was able to visit households 1.7 days after the culture result was received from the hospital (3.9 days from hospital admission). Coverage of WASH and health behavior messaging campaigns were 30.2% in the target areas. Recipients of the intervention were more likely to have knowledge of cholera symptoms, treatment, and prevention than non-recipients. Although the RRT were able to investigate cases at the household within 2 days of a positive culture result, the study identified several constraints that limited a truly rapid response.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Micro-Hotspots of Risk in Urban Cholera EpidemicsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2018
- The potential impact of case-area targeted interventions in response to cholera outbreaks: A modeling studyPLOS Medicine, 2018
- Neighborhood-targeted and case-triggered use of a single dose of oral cholera vaccine in an urban setting: Feasibility and vaccine coveragePLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2017
- Effectiveness of one dose of oral cholera vaccine in response to an outbreak: a case-cohort studyThe Lancet Global Health, 2016
- Cholera cases cluster in time and space in Matlab, Bangladesh: implications for targeted preventive interventionsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2016
- Potential for Controlling Cholera Using a Ring Vaccination Strategy: Re-analysis of Data from a Cluster-Randomized Clinical TrialPLOS Medicine, 2016
- A second affordable oral cholera vaccine: implications for the global vaccine stockpileThe Lancet Global Health, 2016
- Updated Global Burden of Cholera in Endemic CountriesPLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2015
- Genomic diversity of 2010 Haitian cholera outbreak strainsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Cholera Epidemic in Guinea-Bissau (2008): The Importance of “Place”PLOS ONE, 2011