Bayesian models for aggregate and individual patient data component network meta‐analysis
Open Access
- 8 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 41 (14) , 2586-2601
Abstract
Network meta‐analysis can synthesize evidence from studies comparing multiple treatments for the same disease. Sometimes the treatments of a network are complex interventions, comprising several independent components in different combinations. A component network meta‐analysis (CNMA) can be used to analyze such data and can in principle disentangle the individual effect of each component. However, components may interact with each other, either synergistically or antagonistically. Deciding which interactions, if any, to include in a CNMA model may be difficult, especially for large networks with many components. In this article, we present two Bayesian CNMA models that can be used to identify prominent interactions between components. Our models utilize Bayesian variable selection methods, namely the stochastic search variable selection and the Bayesian LASSO, and can benefit from the inclusion of prior information about important interactions. Moreover, we extend these models to combine data from studies providing aggregate information and studies providing individual patient data (IPD). We illustrate our models in practice using three real datasets, from studies in panic disorder, depression, and multiple myeloma. Finally, we describe methods for developing web‐applications that can utilize results from an IPD‐CNMA, to allow for personalized estimates of relative treatment effects given a patient's characteristics.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RU 1747/1‐2)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (754936)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (180083)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage?PLOS ONE, 2013
- A Note on Bayesian Inference After Multiple ImputationThe American Statistician, 2010
- Addressing between‐study heterogeneity and inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons: Application to stroke prevention treatments in individuals with non‐rheumatic atrial fibrillationStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Mixed Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions: Psychological Interventions in Coronary Heart DiseaseAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- The Bayesian LassoJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2008
- Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and Bayesian strategiesThe Annals of Statistics, 2005
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Stepwise Selection in Small Data Sets A Simulation Study of Bias in Logistic Regression AnalysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Variable Selection via Gibbs SamplingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1993
- Bayesian Variable Selection in Linear RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988