Influence of overweight and obesity on perinatal outcomes in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cohort study
Authors:
- Victoria Campos DornellesVDVictoria Campos Dornelles
- Marta Ribeiro HentschkeMHMarta Ribeiro Hentschke
- Mariangela BadalottiMBMariangela Badalotti
- Isadora Badalotti-TelokenIBIsadora Badalotti-Teloken
- Vanessa Devens TrindadeVTVanessa Devens Trindade
- Bibiana CunegattoBCBibiana Cunegatto
- Natália Fontoura de VasconcelosNVNatália Fontoura de Vasconcelos
- Alvaro PetraccoAPAlvaro Petracco
- Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da CostaBCBartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa
- Alexandre Vontobel PadoinAPAlexandre Vontobel Padoin
Open Access
- 28 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 22 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
In spontaneous pregnancies, maternal weight and gestational diabetes are independent risk factors for macrosomia and large-for-gestational-age newborns. Furthermore, maternal body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m2 is associated with worse neonatal vitality, classified as an Apgar score of < 7 at the fifth minute of life. However, few studies have evaluated the influence of BMI on perinatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether the perinatal outcomes of assisted reproduction are influenced by BMI. This was a retrospective cohort study performed at a reproductive medicine center. Patients undergoing assisted reproduction (2013–2020) were divided into three groups according to their BMI (kg/m2): group 1, < 25; group 2, 25–29.9, and group 3, ≥30. In total, 1753 in vitro fertilization embryo transfer cycles were analyzed. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or frequency (%). The analysis of variance and chi-square test were performed for comparison. To determine the participants and number of cycles for these analyses, generalized estimating equations were used, considering p < 0.05. In groups 1, 2, and 3, the rates of live birth were 33.5, 32.3, and 29.9% (p = 0.668); preeclampsia were 2.9, 6.1, and 6.3% (p = 0.268); small-for-gestational-age newborns were 23, 23.2, and 21.7% (p = 0.965); macrosomia were 1.9, 0.9, and 2.7% (p = 0.708); Apgar score > 7 at the fifth minute were 97.6, 98.2, and 100% (p = 0.616); and preterm birth were 29.6, 30.1, and 35.1% (p = 0.970), respectively. In conclusion, although the three groups had similar perinatal outcomes in this study, the study population was too small for conclusive results. The higher the BMI, the lower the chances of clinically relevant LBR and the higher the chances of premature labor and preeclampsia.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort studyBMJ Open, 2016
- Maternal Body Mass Index and the Risk of Fetal Death, Stillbirth, and Infant DeathJAMA, 2014
- The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre studyBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention In Vitro Fertilization Registry 2.0Fertility and Sterility, 2013
- The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology cyclesFertility and Sterility, 2012
- Diet and Lifestyle in the Prevention of Ovulatory Disorder InfertilityObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and ElaborationPLOS Medicine, 2007
- Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin AmericaThe Lancet, 2006
- Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.2000
- WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile coupleReproductive Health Matters, 1994