To blame or not to blame: Analysts’ reactions to external explanations for poor financial performance
Authors:
- Jan BartonJBJan Barton
- Molly MercerMMMolly Mercer
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Accounting and Economics
- Vol. 39 (3) , 509-533
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Do Managers Explain Their Earnings Forecasts?Journal of Accounting Research, 2004
- Empirical research on CEO turnover and firm-performance: a discussionJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2003
- The Balance Sheet as an Earnings Management ConstraintThe Accounting Review, 2002
- Voluntary Causal Disclosures: Tendencies and Capital Market ReactionReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2000
- To believe or not to believeJournal of Financial Markets, 1999
- Asset pricing and the bid-ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Differential Information and Security Market EquilibriumJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1985
- Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual ReportsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979