An analysis of the suitability of OpenAlex for bibliometric analyses
Preprint
Abstract
Scopus and the Web of Science have been the foundation for research in the science of science even though these traditional databases systematically underrepresent certain disciplines and world regions. In response, new inclusive databases, notably OpenAlex, have emerged. While many studies have begun using OpenAlex as a data source, few critically assess its limitations. This study, conducted in collaboration with the OpenAlex team, addresses this gap by comparing OpenAlex to Scopus across a number of dimensions. The analysis concludes that OpenAlex is a superset of Scopus and can be a reliable alternative for some analyses, particularly at the country level. Despite this, issues of metadata accuracy and completeness show that additional research is needed to fully comprehend and address OpenAlex's limitations. Doing so will be necessary to confidently use OpenAlex across a wider set of analyses, including those that are not at all possible with more constrained databases.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and ScopusScientometrics, 2025
- Completeness degree of publication metadata in eight free-access scholarly databasesQuantitative Science Studies, 2024
- How are exclusively data journals indexed in major scholarly databases? An examination of four databasesScientific Data, 2023
- An open data set of scholars on TwitterQuantitative Science Studies, 2023
- Towards InnoGraph: A Knowledge Graph for AI Innovation2023
- Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization processQuantitative Science Studies, 2022
- The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of SciencePLOS ONE, 2022
- Citation analysis with microsoft academicScientometrics, 2017
- Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databasesScientometrics, 2006
- The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanitiesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006