Clarity of Responsibility and Corruption
Author:
- 4 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Political Science
- Vol. 51 (1) , 218-229
Abstract
This article demonstrates that political institutions influence the level of corruption via clarity of responsibility. The key hypothesis is that when political institutions provide high clarity of responsibility, politicians face incentives to pursue good policies and reduce corruption. These incentives are induced by the electorates' rejection of incumbents who do not provide satisfactory outcomes. However, if lines of responsibility are not clear, the ability of voters to evaluate and punish politicians—as well as to create incentives for performance—declines. The findings confirm that countries with institutions that allow for greater clarity of responsibility have lower levels of corruption.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electoral Incentives for Political Corruption under Open-List Proportional RepresentationThe Journal of Politics, 2005
- Economic voting: The effect of political context, volatility and turnout on voters’ assignment of responsibilityEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2004
- The Influence of Party Systems on Citizens’ Perceptions of Corruption and Electoral Response in Latin AmericaComparative Political Studies, 2004
- Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative PerspectiveAmerican Political Science Review, 2004
- International Integration and National CorruptionInternational Organization, 2003
- Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinctionEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2003
- New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political InstitutionsThe World Bank Economic Review, 2001
- Is ‘Clarity of Responsibility’ Important for Economic Voting? Revisiting Powell and Whitten's HypothesisBritish Journal of Political Science, 2000
- Accounting for Corruption: Economic Structure, Democracy, and TradeInternational Studies Quarterly, 2000
- Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, ItalyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1986