Robotic cholecystectomy using Revo-i Model MSR-5000, the newly developed Korean robotic surgical system: a preclinical study
- 21 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 31 (8) , 3391-3397
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard option for gastrointestinal surgeries. However, laparoscopic procedures require extended training times and are difficult for inexperienced surgeons. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery facilitates easy adaptation of laparoscopic procedures, but robotic surgical systems are expensive. In addition, their cost has remained high because there is currently only one manufacturer of commercially available systems. Recently, a new Korean robotic surgical system, Revo-i, has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Revo-i by performing robotic cholecystectomy in a porcine model. Methods After approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei University Health System, cholecystectomy was performed in four pigs using the Revo-i robotic surgical system. Operative time and perioperative complications were recorded, and all animals were observed for postoperative complications for 2 weeks after surgery Results Robotic cholecystectomy was completed successfully and without gallbladder perforation in all cases. The mean operative time was 78 ± 12 min, the mean docking time was 4.5 ± 2.52 min, and the mean console time was 49.8 ± 14.17 min. There were no perioperative complications, and none of the animal used for the in vivo models exhibited abnormal behavior during the postoperative observation period. Conclusions These preliminary results verify the safety and efficacy of robotic cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system. Human trials are slated to begin accordingly.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1A2A2A04003460)
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysisSurgical Endoscopy, 2015
- Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpationSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term resultsSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- The First Korean Experience of Telemanipulative Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SystemYonsei Medical Journal, 2007
- Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative studySurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Gastrointestinal Recovery and Outcome after Laparoscopy‐assisted versus Conventional Open Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric CancerWorld Journal of Surgery, 2002
- Feasibility of Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery: 146 CasesWorld Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Randomly Alternating Image Presentation During Laparoscopic Training Leads to Faster Automation to the “Fulcrum Effect”Endoscopy, 2000
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients.1991