Model-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease: The GUIDE Pilot Study
Authors:
- Alon Y. MogilnerAMAlon Y. Mogilner
- Sierra FarrisSFSierra Farris
- Monique GirouxMGMonique Giroux
- Maria GillegoMGMaria Gillego
- Yufan ZhaoYZYufan Zhao
- David BlumDBDavid Blum
- Hemant BokilHBHemant Bokil
- Mark C. PierreMPMark C. Pierre
- 14 May 2015
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by S. Karger AG in Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
- Vol. 93 (4) , 231-239
Abstract
Background: Achieving optimal results following deep brain stimulation (DBS) typically involves several months of programming sessions. The Graphical User Interface for DBS Evaluation (GUIDE) study explored whether a visual programming system could help clinicians accurately predetermine ideal stimulation settings in DBS patients with Parkinson's disease. Methods: A multicenter prospective, observational study was designed that utilized a blinded Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III examination to prospectively assess whether DBS settings derived using a neuroanatomically based computer model (Model) could provide comparable efficacy to those determined through traditional, monopolar review-based programming (Clinical). We retrospectively compared the neuroanatomical regions of stimulation, power consumption and time spent on programming using both methods. Results: The average improvement in UPDRS-III scores was 10.4 ± 7.8 for the Model settings and 11.7 ± 8.7 for the Clinical settings. The difference between the mean UPDRS-III scores with the Model versus the Clinical settings was 0.26 and not statistically significant (p = 0.9866). Power consumption for the Model settings was 48.7 ± 22 μW versus 76.1 ± 46.5 μW for the Clinical settings. The mean time spent programming using the Model approach was 31 ± 16 s versus 41.4 ± 29.1 min using the Clinical approach. Conclusion: The Model-based DBS settings provided similar benefit to the Clinical settings based on UPDRS-III scores and were often arrived at in less time and required less power than the Clinical settings.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effective Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Sites May Differ for Tremor, Bradykinesia and Gait Disturbances in Parkinson’s DiseaseStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2011
- Fusion Image–Based Programming After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain StimulationWorld Neurosurgery, 2011
- Probabilistic analysis of activation volumes generated during deep brain stimulationNeuroImage, 2011
- Evaluation of novel stimulus waveforms for deep brain stimulationJournal of Neural Engineering, 2010
- Selection of Optimal Programming Contacts Based on Local Field Potential Recordings From Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients With Parkinson's DiseaseNeurosurgery, 2010
- Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomesJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2008
- Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulationNeuroImage, 2007
- Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulationClinical Neurophysiology, 2005
- The Morel Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Thalamus: Atlas-to-MR Registration of Internally Consistent Canonical ModelNeuroImage, 2000
- The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of FitJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1951