Review of Applicable Outlier Detection Methods to Treat Geomechanical Data
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 17 May 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Geotechnics
- Vol. 3 (2) , 375-396
Abstract
The reliability of geomechanical models and engineering designs depend heavily on high-quality data. In geomechanical projects, collecting and analyzing laboratory data is crucial in characterizing the mechanical properties of soils and rocks. However, insufficient lab data or underestimating data treatment can lead to unreliable data being used in the design stage, causing safety hazards, delays, or failures. Hence, detecting outliers or extreme values is significant for ensuring accurate geomechanical analysis. This study reviews and categorizes applicable outlier detection methods for geomechanical data into fence labeling methods and statistical tests. Using real geomechanical data, the applicability of these methods was examined based on four elements: data distribution, sensitivity to extreme values, sample size, and data skewness. The results indicated that statistical tests were less effective than fence labeling methods in detecting outliers in geomechanical data due to limitations in handling skewed data and small sample sizes. Thus, the best outlier detection method should consider this matter. Fence labeling methods, specifically, the medcouple boxplot and semi-interquartile range rule, were identified as the most accurate outlier detection methods for geomechanical data but may necessitate more advanced statistical techniques. Moreover, Tukey’s boxplot was found unsuitable for geomechanical data due to negative confidence intervals that conflicted with geomechanical principles.Keywords
Funding Information
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RDCPJ 520428–17, RGPIN-2019-06693)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RDCPJ 520428–17, RGPIN-2019-06693)
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Application of statistical geo-spatial information technology to soil stratification in the Seoul metropolitan areaGeorisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2012
- Note on the Comparison of Some Outlier Labeling TechniquesJournal of Mathematics and Statistics, 2011
- Features and performance of some outlier detection methodsJournal of Applied Statistics, 2011
- A comparative study of Schmidt hammer testing procedures with reference to rock cutting machine performance predictionInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2005
- A suggested improvement to the Schmidt rebound hardness ISRM suggested method with particular reference to rock machineabilityInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1993
- Exploratory Data Analysis for Possibly Censored Data From Skewed DistributionsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1990
- Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier LabelingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Analysis of Extreme ValuesThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950
- Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying ObservationsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950
- Criterion for the rejection of doubtful observationsThe Astronomical Journal, 1852