Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Clinician-Expressed Empathy in Advanced Cancer Consultations and Associations with Patient Outcomes
Open Access
- 11 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Palliative Medicine Reports
- Vol. 1 (1) , 76-83
Abstract
Background: Empathy is a cornerstone of effective communication. However, clinicians' and patients' perceptions of clinician-expressed empathy might differ. The independent perceptions of patients and clinicians on clinician-expressed empathy in advanced cancer consultations and the associations of these perceptions with patient outcomes are unknown. Objective: We assessed (1) patients' and clinicians' independent perceptions of clinician-(self-)expressed empathy in advanced cancer consultations and (2) the associations between these perceptions and affective patient outcomes. Methods: This observational study included data from 41 consultations in the advanced breast cancer setting. Postconsultation, patients' and clinicians' perceptions of clinician-expressed empathy were assessed, as well as patients' (1) pre–post anxiety, (2) post-anxiety, (3) emotional well-being, and (4) satisfaction. Multilevel regression analyses were run to draw conclusions. Results: Patients perceived higher levels of empathy than clinicians, without a significant relationship between the two (mean [ M ] = 85.47, standard deviation [SD] = 14.00 vs. M = 61.88, SD = 15.30, 0–100 scale; β = 0.14, p < 0.138, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.04 to 0.32). Higher patient-perceived empathy was associated with decreased anxiety [(1) β = −0.67, p = 0.039, 95% CI = −1.30 to −0.03; (2) β = −0.15, p = 0.042, 95% CI = −0.30 to −0.01], higher satisfaction ( β = 0.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.08), and lower emotional distress ( β = −0.32, p < 0.001, 95% CI = −0.48 to −0.16). There were no associations with clinicians' perceptions [(1) β = −0.34, p = 0.307, 95% CI = −1.00 to 0.31; (2) β = −0.02, p = 0.824, 95% CI = −0.17 to 0.14; (3) β < 0.01, p = 0.918, 95% CI = −0.03 to 0.02; (4) β = 0.08, p = 0.335, 95% CI = −0.08 to 0.25]. Conclusions: Patients' and clinicians' empathy perceptions differed. In improving patient outcomes, the focus should be on patients' perceptions of clinician-expressed empathy. Future research could focus on ways to elicit patients' perceptions of empathy with the higher aim of improving patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Research Agenda for Communication Between Health Care Professionals and Patients Living With Serious IllnessJAMA Internal Medicine, 2017
- Current State of the Art and Science of Patient-Clinician Communication in Progressive Disease: Patients' Need to Know and Need to Feel KnownJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2014
- Reducing patients’ anxiety and uncertainty, and improving recall in bad news consultations.Health Psychology, 2014
- Changing communication needs and preferences across the cancer care trajectory: insights from the patient perspectiveSupportive Care in Cancer, 2013
- Explicit Prognostic Information and Reassurance About Nonabandonment When Entering Palliative Breast Cancer Care: Findings From a Scripted Video-Vignette StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2013
- A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer carePsycho-Oncology, 2012
- Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomesPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomesPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the diseaseBritish Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Can 40 Seconds of Compassion Reduce Patient Anxiety?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1999