Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms in male patients exhibit different clinical and imaging features compared with those in female patients
Authors:
- Ryohei KozukiRKRyohei Kozuki
- Keitaro SofueKSKeitaro Sofue
- Takamichi MurakamiTMTakamichi Murakami
- Akiyoshi SuzukiASAkiyoshi Suzuki
- Akira KatayamaAKAkira Katayama
- Hisataka ItoHIHisataka Ito
- Eriko YoshizawaEYEriko Yoshizawa
- Kenichi TanakaKTKenichi Tanaka
- Masashi KusakabeMKMasashi Kusakabe
- Katsuhiro SanoKSKatsuhiro Sano
- Akira YamadaAYAkira Yamada
- Takayuki SanomuraTSTakayuki Sanomura
- 9 December 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 51 (6) , 2946-2959
Abstract
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in men and to compare with those in women. Methods One hundred twenty-two patients (38 men and 84 women) with histologically confirmed SPNs from seven institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data, including demographics and preoperative diagnoses, were reviewed, and imaging characteristics on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography were assessed. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between men and women. Results Men were significantly older than women (mean age: 43.7 years vs. 31.1 years, p < 0.001) and had smaller tumors (mean size: 28.5 mm vs. 38.5 mm, p = 0.014). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, SPN was suspected less frequently in men (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of biopsy (p = 0.006). Imaging characteristics revealed that SPNs in men had fewer hemorrhagic changes (p = 0.035), more frequent internal calcifications (p = 0.003), and a higher proportion of solid components (p = 0.009). In women, tumor size (ρ = − 0.292, p = 0.007) and the proportion of solid components (ρ = − 0.276, p = 0.011) negatively correlated with age, whereas no correlations were observed in men. Conclusion SPNs in men exhibit distinct clinical and imaging characteristics, including older age, smaller size, a greater proportion of solid components, and fewer degenerative features compared with those in women. Recognizing these sex-specific differences is important for improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding the optimal management of patients with SPNs. Graphical AbstractKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pancreatic Cystic LesionsGastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 2023
- Can solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas without degeneration be diagnosed with imaging? a comparison study of the solid component of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, neuroendocrine neoplasm, and ductal adenocarcinomaAbdominal Radiology, 2023
- Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population‐based studyCancer Medicine, 2020
- Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patientsEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2015
- Sex differences in immunohistochemical expression and capillary density in pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasmAnnals of Diagnostic Pathology, 2015
- Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: MR imaging findings in 21 patientsClinical Imaging, 2014
- Solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas: distinct patterns of computed tomography manifestation for male versus female patientsLa radiologia medica, 2013
- Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: distinct patterns of onset, diagnosis, and prognosis for male versus female patientsSurgery, 2008
- Solid–pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas in men and women: do they differ?Virchows Archiv, 2006
- Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas: Review of 718 Patients Reported in English LiteratureJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005