A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentation of labour. 1. Obstetric outcome
Authors:
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 94 (6) , 512-517
Abstract
Summary: Sixty women who were progressing slowly in spontaneous labour were assigned at random to three management protocols. Group 1 were observed without the use of oxytocin for 8 h while groups 2 and 3 were managed with a low‐dose and high‐dose oxytocin protocol respectively. The caesarean section rates were not significantly different between the three groups: 45%, 35% and 26% respectively. Cervical dilatation rate increased significantly after oxytocin infusion in both treatment groups compared with controls. The‘delay‐to‐delivery’interval and second stage duration were significantly shorter in the high‐dose group than in the control group. There were no measureable differences in the condition of the newborn infants between the three groups.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentatioi of labour. 2. Uterine activityBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1987
- The effect of oxytocin infusion on uterine activity levels in slow labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1985
- Oxytocin deficiency at delivery with epidural analgesiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1983
- Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in primigravidaeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1982
- Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- An assessment of active management of primigravid labourIrish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 1980
- Active management of labour: care of the fetus.BMJ, 1977
- ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR AND CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTIONBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1970
- Prevention of Prolonged LabourBMJ, 1969