Can we find a precise timing for endoscopic intervention in gastrointestinal bleeding?
Author:
Open Access
- 24 February 2022
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Digestive Endoscopy
- Vol. 34 (4) , 750-752
Abstract
This Editorial refers to the article by J.Y.W. Lau, p 260‐264 of this issue DEN 34:2.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcers and erosions – (BLUE study)Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021
- Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Urgent versus early endoscopyDigestive Endoscopy, 2021
- Factors for unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis in patients with severe peptic ulcer bleedingScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021
- Diagnosis and Management of Non-Variceal Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Review of Current Guidelines and Future PerspectivesJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2020
- Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingGastroenterology, 2020
- Evaluation of scoring models for identifying the need for therapeutic intervention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A new prediction score model for Japanese patientsDigestive Endoscopy, 2016
- Guidelines for endoscopic management of non‐variceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingDigestive Endoscopy, 2016
- A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011
- A risk score to predict need for treatment for uppergastrointestinal haemorrhageThe Lancet, 2000
- Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.Gut, 1996