Human Factors and Ergonomics and the management of existential threats: A work domain analysis of a COVID‐19 return from lockdown restrictions system
Open Access
- 6 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
- Vol. 31 (4) , 412-424
Abstract
Following strict “lockdown” restrictions designed to control the spread of the COVID‐19 virus, many jurisdictions are now engaged in a process of easing restrictions in an attempt to stimulate economic and social activity while continuing to suppress virus transmission. This is challenging and complex, and in several regions, new outbreaks have emerged. We argue that systems Human Factors and Ergonomics methods can assist in understanding and optimizing the return from lockdown. To demonstrate, we used work domain analysis to develop an abstraction hierarchy model of a generic “return from lockdown restrictions” system. The model was assessed to identify (a) issues preventing a successful return from lockdown; and (b) leverage points that could be exploited to optimize future processes. The findings show that the aim of continuing to suppress virus transmission conflicts with the aims of returning to pre‐virus economic and social activity levels. As a result, many functions act against each other, ensuring that the system cannot optimally achieve all three of its primary aims. Potential leverage points include modifying the goals and rules of the system and enhancing communications and feedback. Specifically, it is argued that moderating economic aims and modifying how social and community activities are undertaken will result in longer term suppression of the virus.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sand, surf and sideways: A systems analysis of beaches as complex roadway environmentsSafety Science, 2016
- Applying the prompt questions from the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit: a demonstration in rail level crossing designTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2016
- More than meets the eye: Using cognitive work analysis to identify design requirements for future rail level crossing systemsApplied Ergonomics, 2016
- Fitting methods to paradigms: are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking?Ergonomics, 2016
- Reprint of “Safe places for pedestrians: Using cognitive work analysis to consider the relationships between the engineering and urban design of footpaths”Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015
- Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: A framework to support ‘mesoergonomic’ inquiryApplied Ergonomics, 2014
- Extending systems ergonomics thinking to accommodate the socio-technical issues of Systems of SystemsApplied Ergonomics, 2014
- Advances in the Application of Cognitive Work Analysis2008
- Work domain analysis for air traffic controller weather displaysJournal of Safety Research, 2005
- The Use of Work Domain Analysis for the Design of Training SystemsProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2000