Parthenogenic hybrid geckos differ from their sexual counterparts in skin microbiomes but not in rates of water loss

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The success of parthenogenic populations is facilitated by high fecundity, though studies show that parthenogenic hybrids can express traits of compromised fitness compared with their parent species, such as higher rates of evaporative water loss and greater susceptibility to ectoparasites. Recent works highlighting the importance of microbiomes on host health also show that both host lineage and the environment contribute to an animal's microbiome. In this study, we investigated how reproductive mode and the presence of mites affect evaporative water loss and if the skin bacterial microbiome differs between sympatric sexual and parthenogenic populations of the gecko Heteronotia binoei in central Australia. We collected sexual ( n = 17) and parthenogenic ( n = 66) H. binoei from six local sites (within 3 km of each other) to measure evaporative water loss, record mite infestations, and characterise skin bacterial communities from a subsample of individuals ( n = 17 per reproductive mode). Only parthenogenic individuals had mites, and mite infestations were not severe at our site. We found that neither reproductive mode nor the presence of mites affected evaporative water loss in our study populations, contrary to prior studies elsewhere for the species. In microbiome analyses, we found that reproductive mode significantly predicted community structure and composition; however, local site explained more of the observed variation than other variables. While these findings challenge previously observed differences in physiology between parthenogenic and sexual H. binoei , we found support for ectoparasite susceptibility in parthenogenic individuals. Our microbiome results reinforce that even in sympatry, host lineages harbour unique microbiomes, although the environment largely influences the skin bacterial communities in our study system.
Funding Information
  • Australian Research Council (DP210102176, DP190102395)

This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit: