Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities Under Alternative Electoral Systems
Author:
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 87 (4) , 856-869
Abstract
A simple model is used to compare, under different electoral systems, the incentives for candidates to create inequalities among otherwise homogeneous voters, by making campaign promises that favor small groups, rather than appealing equally to all voters. In this game model, each candidate generates offers for voters independently out of a distribution that is chosen by the candidate, subject only to the constraints that offers must be nonnegative and have mean 1. Symmetric equilibria with sincere voting are analyzed for two-candidate elections and for multicandidate elections under rank-scoring rules, approval voting, and single transferable vote. Voting rules that can guarantee representation for minorities in multiseat elections generate, in this model, the most severely unequal campaign promises.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Theory of Voting EquilibriaAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption: A Game-Theoretic AnalysisGames and Economic Behavior, 1993
- Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral SystemsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Discontinuous Games and Endogenous Sharing RulesEconometrica, 1990
- Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese CaseBritish Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting InstitutionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1987
- The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political ScienceAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political ScienceAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- Voting, or a Price System in a Competitive Market StructureAmerican Political Science Review, 1970