Perspectives of Interventional Cardiologists and Cardiothoracic Surgeons on the Late Diagnosis and Undertreatment of Women Diagnosed with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Preprint
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (sSAS) continues to rise, yet women remain significantly less likely to receive timely intervention. Evidence indicates a 36% lower likelihood of diagnosis and a 20% lower likelihood of undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared with men. The purpose of this study was to examine the perspectives of interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons who treat AS about late diagnosis and undertreatment of women with sSAS. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons across the United States. Participants completed a 10-item open-ended questionnaire developed from published literature. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis to identify key issues related to diagnostic practices, referral patterns, and provider perceptions. Results: Nineteen physicians completed the survey (15% response rate). While most participants believed women receive timely AVR consistent with guidelines, they acknowledged delays due to multifactorial causes, including under-recognition of symptoms, diagnostic variability in community echocardiography practices, limited awareness of sex-specific guideline gaps, and socioeconomic barriers such as financial constraints, caregiver burden, and access to care. Although some respondents denied overt gender bias, others described subtle or unconscious bias influencing referral timing and symptom interpretation. Conclusions: Survey respondents recognized complex clinical and systemic factors contributing to delayed diagnosis and undertreatment of women with sSAS. Enhanced provider education, improved access to diagnostic testing, and revision of sex-specific clinical guidelines are needed to promote equitable care and timely intervention for female patients.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gender Disparity in the Treatment of Aortic StenosisCurrent Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2025
- Sex disparities in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosisAmerican Heart Journal, 2021
- A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021
- IMPULSE: the impact of gender on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis across EuropeOpen Heart, 2021
- Trends of Hospitalizations in the United States from 2000 to 2012 of Patients >60 Years With Aortic Valve DiseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2015
- A Call for an Evidence-Based Approach to the Heart Team for Patients With Severe Aortic StenosisJACC, 2015
- Aortic Stenosis in the ElderlyJACC, 2013
- Response Rates and Response Bias for 50 Surveys of PediatriciansHealth Services Research, 2005
- Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthinessNurse Education Today, 2004
- Aortic Valve Replacement in the Elderly: Frequently Indicated yet Frequently DeniedGerontology, 2002