Tonic, Burst, High-Density, and 10-kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Efficiency and Patients' Preferences in a Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Predominant Population. Review of Literature
- 1 December 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 144, e331-e340
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A 2-center Comparative Study on Tonic Versus Burst Spinal Cord StimulationThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2015
- A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Examine the Effectiveness of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Patterns for the Treatment of Failed Back Surgery SyndromeNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2014
- Sustained Effectiveness of 10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Chronic, Low Back Pain: 24-Month Results of a Prospective Multicenter StudyPain Medicine, 2014
- Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation Evaluated in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and Painful Diabetic NeuropathyNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2014
- Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Limb and Back PainWorld Neurosurgery, 2013
- High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter European Clinical StudyNeuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 2012
- Burst Spinal Cord StimulationNeurosurgery, 2010
- THE EFFECTS OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION IN NEUROPATHIC PAIN ARE SUSTAINEDNeurosurgery, 2008
- Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Cost Effectiveness and Cost Utility Analysis Based on a Randomized, Controlled TrialNeurosurgery, 2007
- Pain Mechanisms: A New TheoryScience, 1965