Is trade dispute a major factor influencing the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV products trade?
Authors:
- 27 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Energy Sector Management
- Vol. 14 (5) , 935-952
Abstract
Purpose: Through empirical analysis of Sino-US solar photovoltaic (PV) trade, this paper aims to evaluate the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV trade by adopting trade combination degree (TCD) index, export similarity index (SI) and trade complementarity index (TCI). It also explores the role of trade disputes over Sino-US solar PV trade between China and the USA and important factors affecting the complementarity of the trade. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the comparative advantage theory, this paper selects the TCD, export SI and TCI to evaluate the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV trade comprehensively. Among them, TCD and SI can directly reflect the degree of cooperation and competition of Sino-US solar PV trade. Finally, the authors further analyze the decisive factors affecting the complementarity of Sino-US PV trade by entropy weight method and multiple linear regression analysis on the influencing factors of TCI. Findings: The solar PV trade between China and the USA still has a close relationship, and there is solar PV trade cooperation and competition between the two countries. The factors affecting the complementarity of Sino-US solar PV trade are mainly exchange rate levels rather than trade disputes between China and the USA. The solar PV trade policies of China and the USA will have a great negative impact on the global supply chain of solar PV products. The major solar PV products in China and the USA have a clear division in the global supply chain and still have a strong trade complementarity. Originality/value: This paper conducts an empirical analysis of the Sino-US solar PV trade rather than a policy discussion. This research has important practical significance for the healthy and sustainable development of solar PV trade for both countries. It can also provide references to the current trade disputes between China and the USA in a broader sense.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shedding Light on the Recent U.S.–China Solar DisputeGlobal Economy Journal, 2013
- Complementarities of trade advantage and trade competitiveness measuresApplied Economics, 2012
- Going “green”: trade specialisation dynamics in the solar photovoltaic sectorEnergy Policy, 2011
- Dynamic Patterns of Korea-Vietnam Trade RelationsInternational Area Review, 2010
- The challenges to the liberal trading systemJournal of Policy Modeling, 2009
- The potentials and limits of China–EU cooperation on climate change and energy securityAsia Europe Journal, 2008
- India–Bangladesh Trade Deficit and Misaligned Bilateral Exchange Rate: Can Bangladesh Draw Lessons from Indonesia?Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2007
- An assessment of trends in China's comparative advantages in textile machinery, man-made fibers, textiles and apparelThe Journal of the Textile Institute, 2006
- The policy relevance of virtual water can be enhanced by considering comparative advantagesAgricultural Water Management, 2004
- A Measure of `Export Similarity' and Its Possible UsesThe Economic Journal, 1979