Effectiveness of simple approaches in mitigating residual deformations in buildings
- 21 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Vol. 36 (12) , 1763-1783
Abstract
Developments in performance‐based seismic design and assessment approaches have emphasized the importance of considering residual deformations. Recent investigations have also led to a proposed direct displacement‐based design (DDBD) approach which includes an explicit consideration of the expected residual deformations as an integral part of the design process. Having estimated the expected residual deformations in a structure, engineers are faced with the problem of reducing them to meet the targeted performance levels under pre‐defined seismic hazard levels. Previous studies have identified the post‐yield stiffness as a primary factor influencing the magnitude of residual deformations in single degree of freedom and multiple degree of freedom structures. In this paper, a series of simple approaches to increase the post‐yield stiffness of traditional framed and braced systems for the purpose of reducing residual deformations are investigated. These methods do not utilize recentring post‐tensioned technology. This contribution addresses the feasibility of altering the lateral post‐yield stiffness of structural systems by: (i) using different reinforcement materials with beneficial features in their stress–strain behaviour; (ii) re‐designing the section geometry and properties of primary seismic‐resisting elements; and (iii) introducing a secondary elastic frame to act in parallel with the primary system. The efficiency of each of these techniques is investigated through monotonic and cyclic moment‐curvature and non‐linear time‐history analyses. Of these approaches the design and introduction of an elastic secondary system was found to be most effective and consistent in reducing residual deformations. A simplified design approach for achieving the desired increase of a system's post‐yield stiffness is also presented. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Inelastic Torsion in the Determination of Residual DeformationsJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 2007
- Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual systemEngineering Structures, 2006
- Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessmentEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2006
- Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structuresEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2005
- THE USE OF REAL EARTHQUAKE ACCELEROGRAMS AS INPUT TO DYNAMIC ANALYSISJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 2004
- PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRAME STRUCTURES INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS. PART II: MULTI-DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMSJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 2003
- PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRAME STRUCTURES INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS. PART I: SINGLE-DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMSJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 2003
- SOME DESIGN PRINCIPLES RELEVANT TO TORSIONAL PHENOMENA IN DUCTILE BUILDINGSJournal of Earthquake Engineering, 2001
- Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic designSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2001
- Residual Displacement Response SpectrumJournal of Structural Engineering, 1998