Intertidal Gleaning Exclusion as a Trigger for Seagrass Species and Fauna Recovery and Passive Seagrass Rehabilitation
Open Access
Abstract
This study evaluates gleaning exclusion as an approach for the rehabilitation of seagrass ecosystems and as an option for important intertidal resource management that contributes to the social well-being of communities. The monitoring of seagrass plant and invertebrate recovery after the implementation of gleaning exclusion was conducted over 50 plots of 5 m × 5 m each, which were settled in the seagrass meadow of NW Maputo Bay, Mozambique. The exclusion experiment was designed to compensate for the important loss of seagrass in the area due to gleaning activity characterized mainly by digging and revolving sediments to collect mostly clams. Results showed that, in general, seagrass plant shoot density started having significant positive recovery after five months: three months for Halophila ovalis, five months for Halodule uninvervis, and much more time (>six months) for the IUCN Red List endangered Zostera capensis. For invertebrates, 194 individual invertebrates were collected belonging to 13 species. Solen cylindraceus was the most dominant edible invertebrate species in the local community, and Dosinia hepatica for non-edible species. The result of the experiment showed a positive recovery in the abundance and diversity of invertebrates. The results support previous findings, suggesting that the installation of a no-take zone can enhance the health of an ecosystem. Therefore, to limit the violation and conflicts of the no-take zones, the creation of alternative activities for harvesters and the flexibility of restrictions are vital. Further investigation should be considered to obtain an effective management of the zones, including documentation of species, gleaning practices, and an effective restoration of seagrass meadows.Keywords
Funding Information
- REFORM scholarship program (UEM, Mozambique) (MAS-MA/OP/2018/02, GEF Project ID: 4940; SSFA/2019/2480)
- MASMA “seagrass protect”/WIOMSA (MAS-MA/OP/2018/02, GEF Project ID: 4940; SSFA/2019/2480)
- AKDN—Fundação Aga Khan and FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (MAS-MA/OP/2018/02, GEF Project ID: 4940; SSFA/2019/2480)
- WIOSAP/UNEP (MAS-MA/OP/2018/02, GEF Project ID: 4940; SSFA/2019/2480)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Small Scale Fisheries Management: Lessons from Cockle Harvesters in Nicaragua and TanzaniaCoastal Management, 2010
- Recognising the necessity for Indo‐Pacific seagrass conservationConservation Letters, 2010
- Monitoring, modeling, and management impacts of bivalve filter feeders in the oligohaline and tidal fresh regions of the Chesapeake Bay systemEcological Modelling, 2010
- Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystemsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Guidelines for seagrass restoration: Importance of habitat selection and donor population, spreading of risks, and ecosystem engineering effectsMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2009
- Marine Protected Areas in the Eastern African Region: How Successful Are They?AMBIO, 2002
- Growth of seagrass Halophila ovalis at dugong trails compared to existing within-patch variation in a Thailand intertidal flatMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1999
- Changes in Community Structure and Biomass of Seagrass Communities along Gradients of Siltation in SE AsiaEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 1998
- Response of a mixed Philippine seagrass meadow to experimental burialMarine Ecology Progress Series, 1997
- The effects of shell collecting on the abundance of gastropods on Tanzanian shoresBiological Conservation, 1993