How Does Tendon Region, Donor, and the Presence of Disease Affect Protein Composition of the Achilles Tendon?

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: Response to treatment for tendinopathy is variable, which may reflect variability in underlying etiology and capacity for the tendon to respond to treatment. Understanding variability in tendon protein composition may help improve our understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of painful tendon degeneration and inform treatment targets. Questions/purposes: (1) What factors (tendon region, individual characteristics, presence of disease) contribute to protein compositional (proteomic) and structural variation in human Achilles tendons? (2) What compositional changes characterize tendinopathy, and what protein interactions might contribute to tendon degeneration? (3) How does diabetes influence tendon composition, and what mechanisms might underlie tendon dysfunction in individuals with diabetes? Methods: In this exploratory, cross-sectional study, human Achilles tendon specimens were obtained from individuals with (diabetes group, n = 5) or without diabetes (control group, n = 5) undergoing lower extremity amputation and from individuals undergoing tendon debridement surgeries for tendinopathy (tendinopathy group, n = 8). Specimens were collected between 2019 and 2023. Protein abundances were quantified and analyzed using mass spectrometry, hierarchical clustering, and principal component analysis. To evaluate the role of tendon region and donor on tendon protein compositional variability, we assessed proteomic differences between three regions in nontendinopathic tendons from three individuals. To identify the contribution of disease (that is, presence of tendinopathy or diabetes) on protein composition, we compared tendons from the tendinopathy (n = 8 [2 males, 6 females], mean ± SD age 48 ± 11 years), diabetes (n = 5 [3 males, 2 females], age 54 ± 9 years), and control (n = 5 [3 males, 2 females], age 42 ± 12 years) groups. Proteomic differences associated with tendinopathy and diabetes were further examined using functional enrichment and protein-protein interaction network analysis. Results: Variability in tendon protein composition was primarily from presence of disease, followed by donor and then tendon region. Protein composition distinguished tendons with tendinopathy from controls, with 311 proteins differentially expressed (152 overexpressed and 159 underexpressed; fold change ≥ 1.5, p < 0.05) and higher Bonar scores indicating greater degeneration (mean ± SD Bonar score tendinopathy group 8.6 ± 1.2 versus control group 2.1 ± 0.7; p = 0.01). Pathway analysis identified dysregulation in extracellular matrix remodeling (TIMP1, MMP3, MMP10), inflammatory response (TNF-α, EGFR1), and metabolic reprogramming. Tendons from individuals with diabetes exhibited minimal proteomic changes compared with the control group, with 66 differentially expressed proteins (31 overexpressed and 35 underexpressed; fold change ≥ 1.5, p < 0.05) with no histopathologic differences between diabetes and control group tendons (mean ± SD Bonar score diabetes group 3.4 ± 1.0 versus control group 2.1 ± 0.7; p = 0.19). Tendons in the diabetes group showed reductions in Type I collagen, enrichment of pathways associated with fibrosis and metabolic dysfunction, and inflammatory pathways associated with α6β4 integrin. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that Achilles tendon composition primarily differs based on disease etiology, with tendinopathy showing extensive extracellular matrix disruption and inflammatory activity, whereas tendons from individuals with diabetes exhibit more subtle compositional changes. This distinction suggests that tendinopathy may require targeted interventions addressing tissue remodeling and inflammation, whereas diabetes may predispose tendons to injury but not directly result in degeneration. Understanding these protein compositional variations can help refine hypotheses about disease progression, treatment response, and potential therapeutic targets. Clinical Relevance: While proteomic analysis is not currently a part of routine clinical assessment, these findings provide a framework for identifying protein markers that may aid in early diagnosis or patient stratification to improve treatment alignment. Future studies could determine whether these proteomic changes correlate with treatment response and further inform our understanding of early-stage degeneration from chronic disease. By bridging molecular findings with clinical presentation, this study lays the groundwork for future research on precision medicine approaches for tendon disorders, with the long-term goal of tailoring treatment based on both biological and symptomatic characteristics.
Funding Information
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F32 DK123916)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR002345)
  • Clinical Center (P30 AR074882)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K01 AR083496)
  • Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (NCI P30 CA091842)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS UL1 TR000448)

This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit: