SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Workers: Analysis from Verona SIEROEPID Study during the Pre-Vaccination Era
Authors:
- Stefano PorruStefano Porru
- Maria Grazia Lourdes MonacoMaria Grazia Lourdes Monaco
- Angela CartaAngela Carta
- Gianluca SpiteriGSGianluca Spiteri
- Marco ParpaiolaMPMarco Parpaiola
- Andrea BattaggiaABAndrea Battaggia
- Giulia GalligioniGGGiulia Galligioni
- Beatrice FerrazziBFBeatrice Ferrazzi
- Giuliana Lo CascioGiuliana Lo Cascio
- Davide GibelliniDGDavide Gibellini
- Angelo PerettiAPAngelo Peretti
- Martina BruttiMBMartina Brutti
Open Access
- 14 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 18 (12) , 6446
Abstract
Background: To report the baseline phase of the SIEROEPID study on SARS-CoV-2 infection seroprevalence among health workers at the University Hospital of Verona, Italy, between spring and fall 2020; to compare performances of several laboratory tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. Methods: 5299 voluntary health workers were enrolled from 28 April 2020 to 28 July 2020 to assess immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout IgM, IgG and IgA serum levels titration by four laboratory tests. Association of antibody titre with several demographic variables, swab tests and performance tests (sensitivity, specificity, and agreement) were statistically analyzed. Results: The overall seroprevalence was 6%, considering either IgG and IgM, and 4.8% considering IgG. Working in COVID-19 Units was not associated with a statistically significant increase in the number of infected workers. Cohen’s kappa of agreement between MaglumiTM and VivaDiagTM was quite good when considering IgG only (Cohen’s kappa = 78.1%, 95% CI 74.0–82.0%), but was lower considering IgM (Cohen’s kappa = 13.3%, 95% CI 7.8–18.7%). Conclusion: The large sample size with high participation (84.7%), the biobank and the longitudinal design were significant achievements, offering a baseline dataset as the benchmark for risk assessment, health surveillance and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection for the hospital workforce, especially considering the ongoing vaccination campaign. Study results support the national regulator guidelines on using swabs for SARS-CoV-2 screening with health workers and using the serological tests to contribute to the epidemiological assessment of the spread of the virus.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM antibody tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA in COVID-19 patientsClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2020
- Evaluation of the EUROIMMUN Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA Assay for detection of IgA and IgG antibodiesJournal of Clinical Virology, 2020
- Health Surveillance and Response to SARS-CoV-2 Mass Testing in Health Workers of a Large Italian Hospital in Verona, VenetoInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020
- Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020
- Prevalence of Sars-Cov-2 Infection in Health Workers (HWs) and Diagnostic Test Performance: The Experience of a Teaching Hospital in Central ItalyInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020
- Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2JAMA, 2020
- Current laboratory diagnostics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).2020
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Serology in Asymptomatic Healthcare Professionals: Preliminary Experience of a Tertiary Italian Academic CentermedRxiv, 2020
- Assessment of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 with fully automated MAGLUMI 2019-nCoV IgG and IgM chemiluminescence immunoassaysClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2020
- Analytical performances of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and antibody kineticsClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2020