Conflicts and defensive communication: investigating the mature, neurotic and immature defences of service professionals
Authors:
- 22 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Conflict Management
- Vol. 35 (4) , 633-657
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine task and relationship conflict and their linkage with defensive communication strategies, i.e. mature, neurotic and immature defensive communication. Furthermore, Study 1 also investigated the mediating impact of relationship conflict and the moderating impact of a manager’s active-empathic listening in dealing with task conflicts and the defensive communication of the employees. Study 2 intended to assess the causal direction of task conflicts and defensive communication strategies. Design/methodology/approach: This research integrates the Job Demands–Resources framework, Conservation of Resources theory and Conflict Expression framework. Data from 124 professionals in India’s tertiary industry was gathered using a longitudinal approach. Study 1 analyses the dynamics between conflicts and defensive communication while considering managers’ active-empathic listening as a potential mitigating factor. Study 2 was conducted after a 10-month interim to delve into the intricate causal connections between defensive communication strategies and task conflicts. For analysing the data, SPSS was used for conducting confirmatory factor analysis. Furthermore, to analyse the conceptual framework and the hypothesised relationships in this study, partial least squares (PLS) modelling was performed using Smart-PLS 4.0. Findings: Task conflicts have a significant negative association with mature and neurotic defensive communication, whereas they have a strong positive relationship with immature defensive communication. Relationship conflict significantly mediates the association between task conflict and immature defensive communication. The moderating role of the manager’s active-empathic listening was not supported. In addition, the relationship between immature defensive communication and task conflict is significantly positive, outlining their bidirectional association. In contrast, the association between mature defensive communication is significantly negative. This highlights the potential of immature defensive communication to create escalatory conflict spirals and of mature defensive communication to de-escalate them. Research limitations/implications: Defensive communication strategies, commonly explored in the psychological realm, particularly within family and romantic relationship contexts, have received limited attention in organisational behaviour. This longitudinal study offers a unique perspective on the evolution of defensive communication and its impact on task conflict over time, enhancing the understanding of how individuals adapt their communication strategies as conflicts persist or dissipate. The investigation also advances the understanding of conflict spirals, illustrating the potential of mature defensive communication to de-escalate conflicts while revealing a bidirectional connection between immature defensive communication and task conflicts. Practical implications: Leaders need to prioritise addressing task conflicts, particularly those that might spiral into relationship conflicts. This would present managers with the ability to make task conflicts more functional in nature, which could help to enhance both team and organisational achievements. The bidirectional relationship between task conflict and immature defensive communication points towards the exigency for managerial and organisational initiatives to prevent the development of conflict spirals at the workplace. Originality/value: This study offers crucial interdisciplinary perspectives into the body of literature with the longitudinal investigation of the connections between managers’ active-empathetic listening, task conflict, relationship conflict and the various defensive communication strategies. With the help of insights from this study, managers and leaders will be empowered to take the necessary actions to reduce employee defensive behaviours and foster a supportive culture for evoking positive and desirable performance.Keywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpersonal Justice, Relational Conflict, and Commitment to Change: The Moderating Role of Social InteractionApplied Psychology, 2013
- The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS): Conceptualization and Evidence of Validity Within the Interpersonal DomainCommunication Quarterly, 2011
- The Creation of Defensiveness in Social Interaction II: A Model of Defensive Communication among Romantic CouplesCommunication Monographs, 2008
- The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the artJournal of Managerial Psychology, 2007
- Development and validation of the active empathetic listening scalePsychology & Marketing, 2005
- Bringing the Frame Into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004
- MAXIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF TASK CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENTInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 2001
- Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods, 1998
- A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup ConflictAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1995
- Defensiveness in Communication: Its Causes, Effects, and CuresInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1980