Latitudinal phytoplankton distribution and the neutral theory of biodiversity
- 16 November 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Vol. 22 (5) , 531-543
Abstract
Aim: Recent studies have suggested that global diatom distributions are not limited by dispersal, in the case of both extant species and fossil species, but rather that environmental filtering explains their spatial patterns. Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity provides a framework in which to test these alternatives. Our aim is to test whether the structure of marine phytoplankton (diatoms, dinoflagellates and coccolithophores) assemblages across the Atlantic agrees with neutral theory predictions. We asked: (1) whether intersite variance in phytoplankton diversity is explained predominantly by dispersal limitation or by environmental conditions; and (2) whether species abundance distributions are consistent with those expected by the neutral model.Location: Meridional transect of the Atlantic (50° N–50° S).Methods: We estimated the relative contributions of environmental factors and geographic distance to phytoplankton composition using similarity matrices, Mantel tests and variation partitioning of the species composition based upon canonical ordination methods. We compared the species abundance distribution of phytoplankton with the neutral model using Etienne's maximum‐likelihood inference method.Results: Phytoplankton communities are slightly more determined by niche segregation (24%), than by dispersal limitation and ecological drift (17%). In 60% of communities, the assumption of neutrality in species’ abundance distributions could not be rejected. In tropical zones, where oceanic gyres enclose large stable water masses, most communities showed low species immigration rates; in contrast, we infer that communities in temperate areas, out of oligotrophic gyres, have higher rates of species immigration.Conclusions: Phytoplankton community structure is consistent with partial niche assembly and partial dispersal and drift assembly (neutral processes). The role of dispersal limitation is almost as important as habitat filtering, a fact that has been largely overlooked in previous studies. Furthermore, the polewards increase in immigration rates of species that we have discovered is probably caused by water mixing conditions and productivity.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Drivers of bacterial β-diversity depend on spatial scaleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- Fluid dynamical niches of phytoplankton typesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Limits to gene flow in a cosmopolitan marine planktonic diatomProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Phytoplankton Biogeography and Community Stability in the OceanPLOS ONE, 2010
- The Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) Programme: A contextual view 1995–2005Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 2006
- Diversity: between neutrality and structureOikos, 2006
- Beta Diversity in Tropical ForestsScience, 2002
- Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richnessEcology Letters, 2001
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm?Ecology, 1993