A Multistate Investigation of Serious Adverse Events, Including Deaths, Following Ceftriaxone Injections, September 2024–August 2025
- 3 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Abstract
Background: Reports of ceftriaxone serious adverse events (SAEs), including deaths, from multiple jurisdictions during December 2024–January 2025 prompted a nationwide investigation to evaluate product safety, characterize SAEs, and assess for changes in baseline adverse event occurrence via national databases. Methods: In February 2025, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a national call for cases, defined as SAEs involving death or cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 6 hours of ceftriaxone injection, not otherwise explained and occurring in non–intensive care unit settings during September 2024–August 2025. Epidemiologic and clinical data were collected by health departments and reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory testing of ceftriaxone and lidocaine diluent was performed at Food and Drug Administration. Temporal trends in adverse events (2016–2019 vs 2020–2024) were assessed via Medicare claims and National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance System analyses. Results: Among 31 cases identified from 27 healthcare facilities (65% outpatient) across 18 states during September 2024–August 2025, all involving death or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 12 (39%) persons died, 23 (74%) had anaphylaxis-type presentations (65% without skin/mucosal involvement), 21 (68%) had previous ceftriaxone exposure, and 24 (77%) had cardiac comorbidities. Median age was 67 years (interquartile range: 60–81). Antihypertensive use was common (n = 19/28, 68%). Product testing revealed no evidence of tampering, adulteration, endotoxin, or purity/potency issues. National adverse event trends were stable across 2016–2019 and 2020–2024. Conclusions: SAEs, including deaths, can occur after ceftriaxone receipt. Product testing and trend analyses did not identify evidence of a new safety issue. This investigation highlights the need for ongoing vigilance for ceftriaxone SAEs and reporting to Food and Drug Administration MedWatch.Keywords
Funding Information
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cephalosporin triggered Kounis syndrome: Pathophysiological and clinical insightsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2025
- Anaphylaxis: A 2023 practice parameter updateAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2023
- Ceftriaxone and the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmia, Cardiac Arrest, and Death Among Patients Receiving LansoprazoleJAMA Network Open, 2023
- Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter updateJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2022
- Cephalosporin Allergy: Current Understanding and Future ChallengesThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2019
- National Estimates of Emergency Department Visits for Antibiotic Adverse Events Among Adults—United States, 2011–2015Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018
- The 3 Cs of Antibiotic Allergy—Classification, Cross-Reactivity, and CollaborationThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2017
- Adverse reactions associated with oral and parenteral use of cephalosporins: A retrospective population-based analysisJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2015
- Asystole after the first dose of ceftriaxoneThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: Summary report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposiumJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2006