Randomized Phase III Study of Fludarabine Phosphate Versus Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Patients With Recurrent Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Previously Treated With an Alkylating Agent or Alkylator-Containing Regimen
- 15 December 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (24) , 4649-4654
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare in a phase III study the safety and efficacy of fludarabine to that of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) in recurrent, low-grade, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after previous response to systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to fludarabine (25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 5, every 28 days) or CVP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 both intravenously on day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 5, every 21 days). The primary outcome assessed was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included treatment-free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related toxicity, and quality of life (QoL) according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer’s Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 version 1.0 instrument. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were randomized, 47 to fludarabine and 44 to CVP. There was no difference in response rates, with 64% (complete response [CR], 9%) for fludarabine versus 52% (CR, 7%) for CVP (P = .72). With a median follow-up of 42 months, median PFS (11 months v 9.1 months; P = .03) and TFS (15 months v 11 months; P = .02) were superior in patients receiving fludarabine. No difference in median overall survival was detected (57 months for fludarabine v 44 months for CVP; P = .95). Three patients receiving fludarabine died of treatment-related toxicity compared with none of the patients receiving CVP. Peripheral neuropathy and alopecia were more common with CVP. Patients receiving fludarabine had higher scores for social function (P = .008); no other differences in QoL were detected. CONCLUSION: In recurrent low-grade lymphoma, fludarabine improves PFS, TFS, and social function scores in comparison with CVP but does not improve OS.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fludarabine Compared with Chlorambucil as Primary Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Phase I Study of Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Previously Untreated Low-Grade Lymphoma: Results and and Long-Term Follow-Up—A Report From the Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Randomized Trial of Fludarabine Versus Fludarabine and Idarubicin as Frontline Treatment in Patients With Indolent or Mantle-Cell LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- AUTOLOGOUS HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMAHematology/Oncology Clinics of North America, 1999
- The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30Quality of Life Research, 1996
- Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b Combined with a Regimen Containing Doxorubicin in Patients with Advanced Follicular LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Interferon Alfa Combined with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Patients with Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The Natural History of Initially Untreated Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's LymphomasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958