Lessons from Polyomavirus Immunofluorescence Staining of Urinary Decoy Cells
Authors:
Open Access
Abstract
Decoy cells that can be detected in the urine sediment of immunosuppressed patients are often caused by the uncontrolled replication of polyomaviruses, such as BK-Virus (BKV) and John Cunningham (JC)-Virus (JCV), within the upper urinary tract. Due to the wide availability of highly sensitive BKV and JCV PCR, the diagnostic utility of screening for decoy cells in urine as an indicator of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) has been questioned by some institutions. We hypothesize that specific staining of different infection time-dependent BKV-specific antigens in urine sediment could allow cell-specific mapping of antigen expression during decoy cell development. Urine sediment cells from six kidney transplant recipients (five males, one female) were stained for the presence of the early BKV gene transcript lTag and the major viral capsid protein VP1 using monospecific antibodies, monoclonal antibodies and confocal microscopy. For this purpose, cyto-preparations were prepared and the BK polyoma genotype was determined by sequencing the PCR-amplified coding region of the VP1 protein. lTag staining began at specific sites in the nucleus and spread across the nucleus in a cobweb-like pattern as the size of the nucleus increased. It spread into the cytosol as soon as the nuclear membrane was fragmented or dissolved, as in apoptosis or in the metaphase of the cell cycle. In comparison, we observed that VP1 staining started in the nuclear region and accumulated at the nuclear edge in 6–32% of VP1+ cells. The staining traveled through the cytosol of the proximal tubule cell and reached high intensities at the cytosol before spreading to the surrounding area in the form of exosome-like particles. The spreading virus-containing particles adhered to surrounding cells, including erythrocytes. VP1-positive proximal tubule cells contain apoptotic bodies, with 68–94% of them losing parts of their DNA and exhibiting membrane damage, appearing as “ghost cells” but still VP1+. Specific polyoma staining of urine sediment cells can help determine and enumerate exfoliation of BKV-positive cells based on VP1 staining, which exceeds single-face decoy staining in terms of accuracy. Furthermore, our staining approaches might serve as an early readout in primary diagnostics and for the evaluation of treatment responses in the setting of reduced immunosuppression.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City of Vienna (22100, 22099)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: SV40 Co-opts Host Genome Maintenance Proteins to Replicate Viral DNAPLOS Pathogens, 2012
- Polyomavirus BK Replication in De Novo Kidney Transplant Patients Receiving Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter StudyAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2012
- Virion Assembly Factories in the Nucleus of Polyomavirus-Infected CellsPLOS Pathogens, 2012
- Nuclear translation visualized by ribosome-bound nascent chain puromycylationJournal of Cell Biology, 2012
- Regulation of Gene Expression in Primate PolyomavirusesJournal of Virology, 2009
- A truncated T antigen expressed from an alternatively spliced BK virus early mRNAJournal of General Virology, 2009
- Monthly Screening for Polyoma Virus Eliminates BK Nephropathy and Preserves Renal FunctionSurgical Infections, 2009
- Polyomavirus BK Versus JC Replication and Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Prospective EvaluationTransplantation, 2007
- Prospective Study of Polyomavirus Type BK Replication and Nephropathy in Renal-Transplant RecipientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Review: Properties and Assembly Mechanisms of ND10, PML Bodies, or PODsJournal of Structural Biology, 2000