Real-World Comparisons Between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Glucose-Lowering Agents in Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Analyses of Cardiovascular and Economic Outcomes in England
Open Access
- 21 March 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Diabetes Therapy
- Vol. 16 (5) , 955-975
Abstract
Introduction Clinical trials have demonstrated that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who have established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or a high risk of CVD. Nevertheless, GLP-1RAs remain underutilized. This real-world, retrospective study compared cardiovascular and economic outcomes between individuals treated with GLP-1RAs and other glucose-lowering agents in England. Methods Clinical Practice Research Datalink-registered people indexed on GLP-1RAs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, or basal insulin between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 for their fourth line of T2D treatment were stratified into six cohorts based on their: (1) cardiovascular risk (high or very high risk) and (2) indexed therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare the risk of MACE and all-cause death between GLP-1RA and other treatment cohorts. Generalized linear regression was used to quantify differences in healthcare resource use (HCRU) and costs between groups. Results Of 63,237 subjects, 10,607 were at high cardiovascular risk (GLP-1RA: 2709; DPP4 inhibitor: 2673; basal insulin: 5225) and 52,630 at very high cardiovascular risk (GLP-1RA: 14,692; DPP4 inhibitor: 18,461; basal insulin: 19,477). The crude incidence of all outcomes was lower in the GLP-1RA versus other treatment cohorts, regardless of cardiovascular risk. Among very-high-risk individuals treated with GLP-1RA, the adjusted risk of MACE was 33% (24–40%) and 23% (13–23%) lower versus DPP4 inhibitor and basal insulin cohorts, respectively. The adjusted total cardiovascular-related cost among very-high-risk individuals was £208.14 (£155.81–£260.47) and £151.74 (£110.69–£192.79) lower in the GLP-1RA versus DPP4 inhibitor or basal insulin cohorts, respectively. Conclusions In a real-world setting, GLP-1RAs may be associated with a lower risk of MACE and reduced HCRU and costs than DPP4 inhibitors or basal insulin in individuals with T2D, particularly among those at very high cardiovascular risk.Keywords
Funding Information
- Novo Nordisk A/S
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sotagliflozin in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2021
- 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASDEuropean Heart Journal, 2019
- Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trialThe Lancet, 2019
- Precision medicine in diabetes and diabetic kidney disease: Regulatory considerationsDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2018
- Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trialThe Lancet, 2018
- Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic ReviewValue in Health, 2018
- Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the world in 2007–2017Cardiovascular Diabetology, 2018
- Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015